<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling science; policy founded on evidence-based research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frogheart.ca/?feed=rss2&#038;p=574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frogheart.ca/?p=574</link>
	<description>Commentary about nanotech, science policy and communication, society, and the arts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:04:17 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science and Communication &#171; Researcher Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.frogheart.ca/?p=574&#038;cpage=1#comment-25019</link>
		<dc:creator>Science and Communication &#171; Researcher Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frogheart.ca/?p=574#comment-25019</guid>
		<description>[...] generated the most interest. (For an insightful and cogent analysis on the same subject, check out Frogheart, and for some insightful thoughts about the dangers of simplifying science for the sake of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] generated the most interest. (For an insightful and cogent analysis on the same subject, check out Frogheart, and for some insightful thoughts about the dangers of simplifying science for the sake of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
