That UK project where school kids get to vote on which scientist should get an award of 500 pounds for communicating their science project is under way a second time this year. Andrew Maynard at 2020 Science is participating as one of the scientists and he’s posted instructions (go here) on how you can participate as a spectator. Here’s a question from one of the kids to Andrew and the rest of his ‘zone’ (the scientists are organized according to zones),
Question: do you think humans will evolve more?
[Andrew Maynard]
Hi emilyjane,
Tricky one. The easy answer is of course, because evolution is a process that never stops. But where this will lead with humans isn’t so clear – maybe we’ll become extinct. Maybe we’ll evolve into something that isn’t so “smart” (what if brains aren’t an evolutionary advantage in the future?). Just maybe, we’ll be clever enough to take over from evolution and start to intelligently alter ourselves. But that’s a long shot!
[Andrew Leitch]
Hi Emilyjane, Do you think humans will evolve more and if so what adaptations do you think would be most useful?
I think it might be naive to suggest that our technological/scientific advances mean that we don’t need to adapt anymore as we are adapting our environment to suit us.
I guess this might come into play if some cataclysmic/semi-cataclysmic event takes place. Basically if our environment starts fighting back we might not be able to prevent it driving our development in a particular direction.
[Marianne Baker]
Hey emilyjane,
Now it’s been a while since I’ve been deep into evolutionary biology but I do still love the subject so I’ll give this my best shot!
There are different schools of thought that say we have or haven’t stopped evolving.
I think the traditional ‘natural selection’ that applies to many species doesn’t apply to us so much any more – we’ve developed a lot of technology to overcome many of the problems that arise from our genes and environment; but we haven’t conquered them all (cancer research still exists, for example! Though I’d rather it didn’t – when people say “oh you don’t want the cures to be found out because then you wouldn’t have a job” I really hate that – of *course* I would rather find a different job than people continuing to die of cancer… what a horrible thing to say! Anyway, sorry to go on a tangent…).
So yes, we are still evolving, I think.
As long as there are people having children, genes are being passed on, changes are happening (albeit slowly – but then evolution is always slow!).If you mean will we randomly become mutants like in X-men then no, I can’t see that happening!
It’s a complicated subject and I’m not sure the evolutionary biologists themselves agree yet (though they might be horrified by my stupid answers). I do think it’s dangerous to think of human beings, as we are, as ‘the pinnacle of evolution’ – that’s not true, and it breeds a kind of superiority complex, that we’re somehow more important than everything else on the planet, and I’ve never ascribed to that view.
I think the knockout rounds (that’s when students start voting as to which scientists will continue in the competition) will be starting soon. The kids are all in the UK but the scientists can be from anywhere. For example, Andrew Maynard works in the US and he mentioned in one of his postings about his involvement that there’s a scientist from Ghana also competing for the prize.
You can go directly to the I’m a scientist, get me out of here website.
Pingback: Science education for children in Europe « FrogHeart