Monthly Archives: June 2025

AI governance in the real-world ‘city brain’ project: possible pitfalls

An April 16, 2025 Trinity College Dublin press release illustrates the pervasiveness of generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI, GenAI, or GAI) in the management of cities,

The work underscores what can go wrong when an AI that manages city transport, safety, health and environmental monitoring predicts the future and intervenes in the present, significantly influencing urban governance and public policy development.

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is boosting anticipatory forms of governance around the world, helping state actors to predict the future and focus their efforts in the present where the AI predicts they can have the greatest positive impact.

This phenomenon is particularly evident in China, but similar forms of governance mediated by generative AI are also becoming increasingly popular in Europe and the seeds of this trend are already visible in Ireland.

In this context, “city brains” represent an emerging type of generative AI currently employed in urban governance and public policy in a growing number of cities. City brains are large-scale AIs residing in vast digital urban platforms, which use Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate visions of urban futures: visions that are in turn used by policymakers to generate new urban policies. In China alone, there are over 500 cities developing city brains.

However, one of the main foreseeable dangers is the formation of a policy process that, under the influence of unintelligible LLMs, risks losing transparency and thus accountability, with another being the marginalisation of human stakeholders (citizens, in particular) as the role of AI in the management of cities keeps growing and governance begins to turn posthuman.

And by focusing on a real-world city brain project operating in the Haidian district of Beijing (China), which has a population of around 3,000,000 people and gathers data from over 14,000 CCTV cameras and over 20,000 environmental sensors, the researchers have been able to show these dangers are not just theoretical.

A person stands looking at an interactive dashboard of an existing City Brain system in China, at an interactive exhibition centre for the public. The dashboard of an existing City Brain system in China. Image credit: Dr Ying Xu.

Dr Federico Cugurullo, Associate Professor in Trinity’s School of Natural Sciences, is a leading expert in AI urbanism and the first author of the research, which has been published in the journal Policy and Society.

He said: “We can think of the Haidian city brain project as a gigantic panopticon that constantly observes what is happening it the city. It is operated by AI and focuses on three main areas of governance that are shaped by its predictions: environmental risk management, traffic management and public security.”

“For example, in the case of an impending natural disaster, policies are rapidly implemented to build new infrastructure meant to reinforce riverbanks and increase the efficiency of the city’s drainage systems. Outcomes also include direct interventions when, for example, police officers are dispatched to prevent illegal activities in an area where, according to the city brain, crimes are likely to take place in the near future.”

“However, the predictions of the Haidian city brain are far from being infallible. Our research reveals that the accuracy rate of what the city brain predicts varies from 60% to 90%, which leaves a significant margin of error around such important decisions, for which there is no understanding as to why they have been implemented. This is particularly dangerous when it comes to predictive policing, since any error made by AI means that an innocent person will be targeted by the police for hypothetical crimes that never took place.”

This research forms part of the ORACLE project led by Professor Cugurullo, which was funded by Research Ireland (formerly the Irish Research Council).

Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,

When AIs become oracles: generative artificial intelligence, anticipatory urban governance, and the future of cities by Federico Cugurullo, Ying Xu. Policy and Society, Volume 44, Issue 1, January 2025, Pages 98–115, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae025 Published online: 01 August 2024

This paper is open access.

For anyone unfamiliar with the ‘panopticon’, there’s an entry in Wikipedia, Note: Links have been removed,

The panopticon is a design of institutional building with an inbuilt system of control, originated by the English philosopher and social theorist Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century. The concept is to allow all prisoners of an institution to be observed by a single corrections officer, without the inmates knowing whether or not they are being watched.

Although it is physically impossible for the single guard to observe all the inmates’ cells at once, the fact that the inmates cannot know when they are being watched motivates them to act as though they are all being watched at all times. They are effectively compelled to self-regulation. The architecture consists of a rotunda with an inspection house at its centre. From the centre, the manager or staff are able to watch the inmates. Bentham conceived the basic plan as being equally applicable to hospitals, schools, sanatoriums, and asylums. …

I have not been able to find a website for Cugurullo’s ORACLE project but I did find Cugurullo’s January 3, 2025 essay “AI could make cities autonomous, but that doesn’t mean we should let it happen,” which discusses a new field “AI urbanism” and includes the example of an enormous Saudi Arabian project, Neom and its linear city, The Line.

Can citizen science be trusted? Yes, it can!

Caption: Western tanagers are migratory birds that are present in Northern California in the spring and again in late summer. A new study shows that observations by ‘citizen scientists’ using apps such as iNaturalist and eBird accurately reflect bird migrations and therefore can be used in scientific studies. Credit: Jonathan Eisen, UC Davis

Having heard a scientist during an online UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) press briefing (about their 2024 Water Report) express doubts about the accuracy of citizen science data, this study held special interest for me.

An April 15, 2025 University of California at Davis (UC Davis) news release (also on EurekAlert) by Liana Wait announces a study on the accuracy of citizen science-gathered ecological data, Note: Links have been removed,

Platforms such as iNaturalist and eBird encourage people to observe and document nature, but how accurate is the ecological data that they collect?

In a new study published in Citizen Science: Theory and Practice March 28 [2025], researchers from the University of California, Davis, show that citizen science data from iNaturalist and eBird can reliably capture known seasonal patterns of bird migration in Northern California and Nevada — from year-round residents such as California Scrub-Jays, to transient migrants such as the Western Tanager and the Pectoral Sandpiper.

“This project shows that data from participatory science projects with different goals, observers and structure can be combined into reliable and robust datasets to address broad scientific questions,” said senior author Laci Gerhart, associate professor of teaching in the UC Davis Department of Evolution and Ecology. “Contributors to multiple, smaller projects can help make real discoveries about bigger issues.”

Wild Davis research

The study began as a student capstone project in Gerhart’s Wild Davis field course, which teaches students about urban ecology and California ecosystems. First author Cody Carroll, now an assistant professor at the University of San Francisco, took the course in 2020 while completing his doctorate in statistics at UC Davis.

Most Wild Davis capstone projects are focused on community service at the Stebbins Cold Canyon Nature Reserve, but students were restricted to computer-based projects during the COVID-19 shutdown, so Carroll decided to use his statistical expertise to analyze data from iNaturalist.

After Carroll graduated and began working at USF, the team regrouped and took the project a step further by combining the iNaturalist data with data from eBird, a different citizen science platform that is preferred by bird enthusiasts with significant birding experience.

Merging iNaturalist and eBird

Since iNaturalist and eBird differ substantially in the type of data they collect and the type of user they appeal to, the team wanted to investigate whether their data could be integrated.

“eBird is more geared toward trained and very active birders who are doing complete record keeping of the birds that they’re seeing in particular areas,” said Gerhart. “iNaturalist is intentionally geared toward more casual observers who are there as much to learn about the organisms as they are to document them scientifically.”

To merge the data, Carroll considered the relative frequency of observations rather than the overall number of observations and also took into account the cyclic, seasonal nature of bird migrations.

Overall, the researchers compared data for 254 different bird species that were observed in Northern California and Nevada in 2019 and 2022. They found that the two platforms showed similar seasonal patterns for over 97% of bird species.

An assortment of seasonal bird patterns

To “ground truth” their findings, Gerhart and Carroll teamed up with Rob Furrow, an assistant professor of teaching in the Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, who is an avid bird watcher and eBird user.

“We wanted to test whether we were seeing actual migratory patterns or whether these were just due to biases in the observations, so we reached out to Rob, who is an expert about birds,” said Gerhart.

With Furrow’s expertise, the team showed that the combined iNaturalist and eBird data recapitulated a variety of known bird seasonality patterns within the region — meaning that the patterns were representative of actual bird presence, not due to biases in the observations.

For example, their data showed that California Scrub-Jays are present in the region year-round, whereas Bufflehead ducks arrive in mid-fall and depart in early spring. Western Tanagers pass through in late spring when they journey south for winter, and again in late summer as they fly back northwards to breed.

“We were really pleasantly surprised that we could still get reliable data, despite the differences between eBird and iNaturalist,” said Furrow. “Even when you’re relying on casual hobbyists who are taking photos of what they like, when they like, you’re still getting a reliable representation of the birds in that area at that time.”

The power of publicly generated data

The study shows that in addition to inspiring people to connect with nature, platforms such as iNaturalist and eBird can help answer important biological questions.

“This is a good example of why interdisciplinarity is important — we each brought different knowledge to this project, and it pushed each of us intellectually,” said Gerhart. “It was a really fun experience for us to combine our skill sets, and I hope that Cody, Rob and I have a chance to work together again.”

To give back to the people who helped collect the data they used, the team made a point to publish their results in an open access journal. Carroll also created a dashboard, in collaboration with a student at USF, that allows people explore and visualize the seasonality patterns for all 254 bird species.

“It’s important for scientists who are relying on publicly generated data to make sure that their results are also publicly available,” said Gerhart.

Here’s a link to a citation for the paper,

Consistency and Validity of Participatory Science Data: A Comparison of Seasonality Patterns of Northern California and Nevada Birds Across eBird and iNaturalist by Cody Carroll, Robert E. Furrow, Laci M. Gerhart. Citizen Science Theory and Practice Year: 2025 Volume: 10 Issue: 1 Page/Article: 11 DOI: 10.5334/cstp.825 Published on Mar 28, 2025 (Creative Commons Licence: CC Attribution 4.0)

This paper is open access.

You can find the NorCal Bird Dashboard here.

Protecting the brain and internal organs with nanofoam

A March 11, 2025 news item on phys.org announces research on protective sports (and other) equipment, Note: Links have been removed,

Researchers at Michigan State University have refined an innovation that has the potential to improve safety, reduce severe injury and increase survival rates in situations ranging from car accidents, sports, law enforcement operations and more.

In 2020 and 2022, Weiyi Lu, an associate professor in MSU’s College of Engineering, developed a liquid nanofoam material made up of tiny holes surrounded by water that has been shown to protect the brain against traumatic injuries when used as a liner in football helmets. Now, MSU engineers and scientists have improved this technology to shield vital internal organs as well.

Falls, motor vehicle crashes and other kinds of collisions can cause blunt force trauma and damage to bodily organs that can lead to life-threatening emergencies. These injuries are often the result of intense mechanical force or pressure that doesn’t penetrate the body like a cut, but causes serious damage to the body’s organs, including internal lacerations, ruptures, bleeding and organ failure.

Lu and Yun Liang, an assistant professor in the College of Osteopathic Medicine, have teamed up to see how the liquid nanofoam could protect internal organs in the event of blunt force trauma. Their findings are published in the journal Scientific Reports.

A March 11, 2025 Michigan State University (MSU) news release by Emilie Lorditch, which originated the news item, provides more detail about the work,

We improved the liquid nanofoam by adjusting its protective response to match biological organs,” said Lu. “Then, we sealed the liquid nanofoam material inside a plastic pouch about the size of a quarter and made the new protection layer flexible and moldable enough to be worn comfortably against the body.”

To test the capabilities of Lu’s liquid nanofoam, the pouch was used as a protective cover and laid over a tissue sample and compressed by a machine with enough force to mimic a blunt force trauma event.

“For the first time, we are trying to understand how trauma is introduced by mechanical force and effectively mitigated it by using liquid nanofoam,” said Liang. “We are trying to understand the force needed to damage an internal organ, which will be then converted into the future design criteria for protective materials.”

Lu and Liang found that the liquid nanofoam could withstand the mechanical force equal to a blunt force trauma without damaging biological tissue. Liang and her team demonstrated that the liquid nanofoam protected multiple biological tissues, including the liver, kidneys, heart and lungs, from forces and pressures equal to blunt force trauma injuries.

“I could see with my eyes that there’s literally no damage,” said Liang. “I was totally amazed.”

Future applications of the liquid nanofoam could include using it as a protective layer inside an automobile’s framework, to line the walls of an earthquake-proof room or to wear it close to the body as a protective vest that could have multiple applications to save lives and prevent tissue and organ damage from blunt force trauma events.

Here`s a citation and a link to the paper,

Effective protection of biological tissues from severe blunt force injury by engineered nanoscale liquid flow by Fuming Yang, Runqi Zhu, Anqi Zheng, Runsheng An, Weiyi Lu & Yun Liang. Scientific Reports volume 14, Article number: 28947 (2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80490-3 Published: 22 November 2024

This paper is open access.

No animal testing with 3D-printed skin imitation?

An April 3, 2025 news item on ScienceDaily announces work that promises to bring researchers closer to ending nanoparticle cosmetic testing on animals,

A research team from TU Graz [Austria[ and the Vellore Institute of Technology in India is developing a 3D-printed skin imitation equipped with living cells in order to test nanoparticles from cosmetics without animal testing.

Directive 2010/63/EU laid down restrictions on animal testing for the testing of cosmetics and their ingredients throughout the EU. Therefore, there is an intense search for alternatives to test the absorption and toxicity of nanoparticles from cosmetics such as sun creams.

An April 3, 2025 Graz University of Technology (TU Graz) press release by Falko Schoklitsch (also on EurekAlert), which originated the news item, provides more detail about this international collaboration

Hydrogels in which skin cells survive and grow

“The hydrogels for our skin imitation from the 3D printer have to fulfil a number of requirements,” says Karin Stana Kleinschek from the Institute of Chemistry and Technology of Biobased Systems. “The hydrogels must be able to interact with living skin cells. These cells not only have to survive, but also have to be able to grow and multiply.” The starting point for stable and 3D-printable structures are hydrogel formulations developed at TU Graz. Hydrogels are characterised by their high-water content, which creates ideal conditions for the integration and growth of cells. However, the high-water content also requires methods for mechanical and chemical stabilisation of the 3D prints.

TU Graz is working intensively on cross-linking methods for stabilisation. Ideally, following nature’s example, the cross-linking takes place under very mild conditions and without the use of cytotoxic chemicals. After successful stabilisation, the cooperation partners in India test the resistance and toxicity of the 3D prints in cell culture. Only when skin cells in the hydrogel survive in cell culture for two to three weeks and develop skin tissue can we speak of a skin imitation. This skin imitation can then be used for further cell tests on cosmetics.

Successful tests

The first tests of 3D-printed hydrogels in cell culture were very successful. The cross-linked materials are non-cytotoxic and mechanically stable. “In the next step, the 3D-printed models (skin imitations) will be used to test nanoparticles,” says Karin Stana Kleinschek. “This is a success for the complementary research at TU Graz and VIT. Our many years of expertise in the field of material research for tissue imitations and VIT’s expertise in molecular and cell biology have complemented each other perfectly. We are now working together to further optimise the hydrogel formulations and validate their usefulness as a substitute for animal experiments.”

Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,

Protocol for the fabrication of self-standing (nano)cellulose-based 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering by Tamilselvan Mohan, Matej Bračič, Doris Bračič, Florian Lackner, Chandran Nagaraj, Andreja Dobaj Štiglic, Rupert Kargl, Karin Stana Kleinsch. STAR Protocols Volume 6, Issue 1, 21 March 2025, 103583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103583 (Creative Commons Licence: CC by NC 4.0)

This paper is open access.

Dwarfed by a grain of rice—the world’s smallest pacemaker

OMG,

A jaw-dropping moment (for me anyway). An April 2, 2025 news item on Nanowerk announced the research,

Northwestern University engineers have developed a pacemaker so tiny that it can fit inside the tip of a syringe — and be non-invasively injected into the body.

Although it can work with hearts of all sizes, the pacemaker is particularly well-suited to the tiny, fragile hearts of newborn babies with congenital heart defects.

Smaller than a single grain of rice, the pacemaker is paired with a small, soft, flexible, wireless, wearable device that mounts onto a patient’s chest to control pacing. When the wearable device detects an irregular heartbeat, it automatically shines a light pulse to activate the pacemaker. These short pulses— which penetrate through the patient’s skin, breastbone and muscles — control the pacing.

An April 2, 2025 Northwestern University news release by Amanda Morris (also received via email and on EurekAlert), which originated the news item, provides more detail about the work, Note: Links have been removed,

Designed for patients who only need temporary pacing, the pacemaker simply dissolves after it’s no longer needed. All the pacemaker’s components are biocompatible, so they naturally dissolve into the body’s biofluids, bypassing the need for surgical extraction.

The study will be published on April 2 [2025] in the journal Nature. The paper demonstrates the device’s efficacy across a series of large and small animal models as well as human hearts from deceased organ donors.

“We have developed what is, to our knowledge, the world’s smallest pacemaker,” said Northwestern bioelectronics pioneer John A. Rogers, who led the device development. “There’s a crucial need for temporary pacemakers in the context of pediatric heart surgeries, and that’s a use case where size miniaturization is incredibly important. In terms of the device load on the body — the smaller, the better.”

“Our major motivation was children,” said Northwestern experimental cardiologist Igor Efimov, who co-led the study. “About 1% of children are born with congenital heart defects — regardless of whether they live in a low-resource or high-resource country. The good news is that these children only need temporary pacing after a surgery. In about seven days or so, most patients’ hearts will self-repair. But those seven days are absolutely critical. Now, we can place this tiny pacemaker on a child’s heart and stimulate it with a soft, gentle, wearable device. And no additional surgery is necessary to remove it.”

Rogers is the Louis Simpson and Kimberly Querrey Professor of Materials Science and Engineering, Biomedical Engineering and Neurological Surgery at Northwestern — where he has appointments in the McCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine — and the director of the Querrey Simpson Institute of Bioelectronics. Efimov is a professor of biomedical engineering at McCormick and professor of medicine (cardiology) at Feinberg. Rogers and Efimov co-led the study with Yonggang Huang, the Jan and Marcia Achenbach Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Civil and Environmental Engineering at McCormick; Wei Ouyang, an assistant professor of engineering at Dartmouth College; and Rishi Arora, the Harold H. Hines Jr. Professor of Medicine at the University of Chicago.

Meeting an unmet clinical need

This work builds on a previous collaboration between Rogers and Efimov, in which they developed the first dissolvable device for temporary pacing. Many patients require temporary pacemakers after heart surgery — either while waiting for a permanent pacemaker or to help restore a normal heart rate during recovery.

For the current standard of care, surgeons sew the electrodes onto the heart muscle during surgery. Wires from the electrodes exit the front of a patient’s chest, where they connect to an external pacing box that delivers a current to control the heart’s rhythm.

When the temporary pacemaker is no longer needed, physicians remove the pacemaker electrodes. Potential complications include infection, dislodgement, torn or damaged tissues, bleeding and blood clots.

“Wires literally protrude from the body, attached to a pacemaker outside the body,” Efimov said. “When the pacemaker is no longer needed, a physician pulls it out. The wires can become enveloped in scar tissue. So, when the wires are pulled out, that can potentially damage the heart muscle. That’s actually how Neil Armstrong died. He had a temporary pacemaker after a bypass surgery. When the wires were removed, he experienced internal bleeding.”

In response to this clinical need, Rogers, Efimov and their teams developed their dissolvable pacemaker, which was introduced in Nature Biotechnology in 2021. The thin, flexible, lightweight device eliminated the need for bulky batteries and rigid hardware, including wires. Rogers’ lab had previously invented the concept of bioresorbable electronic medicine — electronics that provide a therapeutic benefit to the patient and then harmlessly dissolve in the body like absorbable sutures. By varying the composition and thickness of the materials in these devices, Rogers’ team can control the precise number of days they remain functional before dissolving.

Body fluid-powered battery

While the original quarter-size dissolvable pacemaker worked well in pre-clinical animal studies, cardiac surgeons asked if it was possible to make the device smaller. Then it would be better suited to non-invasive implantation and for use in the smallest patients. But the device was powered by near-field communication protocols — the same technology used in smartphones for electronic payments and in RFID tags — which required a built-in antenna.

“Our original pacemaker worked well,” Rogers said. “It was thin, flexible and fully resorbable. But the size of its receiver antenna limited our ability to miniaturize it. Instead of using the radio frequency scheme for wireless control, we developed a light-based scheme for turning the pacemaker on and delivering stimulation pulses to the surface of the heart. This is one feature that allowed us to dramatically reduce the size.”

To help further reduce the device’s size, the researchers also reimagined its power source. Instead of using near-field communication to supply power, the new, tiny pacemaker operates through the action of a galvanic cell, a type of simple battery that transforms chemical energy into electrical energy. Specifically, the pacemaker uses two different metals as electrodes to deliver electrical pulses to the heart. When in contact with surrounding biofluids, the electrodes form a battery. The resulting chemical reactions cause the electrical current to flow to stimulate the heart.

“When the pacemaker is implanted into the body, the surrounding biofluids act as the conducting electrolyte that electrically joins those two metal pads to form the battery,” Rogers said. “A very tiny light-activated switch on the opposite side from the battery allows us to turn the device from its ‘off’ state to an ‘on’ state upon delivery of light that passes through the patient’s body from the skin-mounted patch.”

Pulsing with light

The team used an infrared wavelength of light that penetrates deeply and safely into the body. If the patient’s heart rate drops below a certain rate, the wearable device detects the event and automatically activates a light-emitting diode. The light then flashes on and off at a rate that corresponds to the normal heart rate.

“Infrared light penetrates very well through the body,” Efimov said. “If you put a flashlight against your palm, you will see the light glow through the other side of your hand. It turns out that our bodies are great conductors of light.”

Even though the pacemaker is so tiny — measuring just 1.8 millimeters in width, 3.5 millimeters in length and 1 millimeter in thickness — it still delivers as much stimulation as a full-sized pacemaker.

“The heart requires a tiny amount of electrical stimulation,” Rogers said. “By minimizing the size, we dramatically simplify the implantation procedures, we reduce trauma and risk to the patient, and, with the dissolvable nature of the device, we eliminate any need for secondary surgical extraction procedures.”

More sophisticated synchronization

Because the devices are so tiny, physicians could distribute collections of them across the heart. A difficult color of light could illuminate to independently control a specific pacemaker. Use of multiple pacemakers in this manner enables more sophisticated synchronization compared to traditional pacing. In special cases, different areas of the heart can be paced at different rhythms, for example, to terminate arrhythmias. 

“We can deploy a number of such small pacemakers onto the outside of the heart and control each one,” Efimov said. “Then we can achieve improved synchronized functional care. We also could incorporate our pacemakers into other medical devices like heart valve replacements, which can cause heart block.”

“Because it’s so small, this pacemaker can be integrated with almost any kind of implantable device,” Rogers said. “We also demonstrated integration of collections of these devices across the frameworks that serve as transcatheter aortic valve replacements. Here, the tiny pacemakers can be activated as necessary to address complications that can occur during a patient’s recovery process. So that’s just one example of how we can enhance traditional implants by providing more functional stimulation.”

The technology’s versatility opens a broad range of other possibilities for use in bioelectronic medicines, including helping nerves and bones heal, treating wounds and blocking pain.

Caption: The tiny pacemaker sits next to a single grain of rice on a fingertip. The device is so small that it can be non-invasively injected into the body via a syringe. Credit: John A. Rogers/Northwestern University

Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,

Millimetre-scale bioresorbable optoelectronic systems for electrotherapy by Yamin Zhang, Eric Rytkin, Liangsong Zeng, Jong Uk Kim, Lichao Tang, Haohui Zhang, Aleksei Mikhailov, Kaiyu Zhao, Yue Wang, Li Ding, Xinyue Lu, Anastasia Lantsova, Elena Aprea, Gengming Jiang, Shupeng Li, Seung Gi Seo, Tong Wang, Jin Wang, Jiayang Liu, Jianyu Gu, Fei Liu, Keith Bailey, Yat Fung Larry Li, Amy Burrell, Anna Pfenniger, Andrey Ardashev, Tianyu Yang, Naijia Liu, Zengyao Lv, Nathan S. Purwanto, Yue Ying, Yinsheng Lu, Claire Hoepfner, Altynai Melisova, Jiarui Gong, Jinheon Jeong, Junhwan Choi, Alex Hou, Rachel Nolander, Wubin Bai, Sung Hun Jin, Zhenqiang Ma, John M. Torkelson, Yonggang Huang, Wei Ouyang, Rishi K. Arora, Igor R. Efimov & John A. Rogers. Nature volume 640, pages 77–86 (2025) DOI https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08726-4 Published online: 02 April 2025 Issue Date: 03 April 2025

This paper is behind a paywall.

With some 50 researchers involved in this work, I have not tagged each one as is my usual practice and I apologize for not tagging each and every one.

Science (and some music) at UK’s Glastonbury Festival from June 25 – 29, 2025

Lancaster University’s June 6 2025 press release offers a preview of what to expect at Glastonbury’s Science Futures area,

From climate change to robot surgeons, and from spiders to AI and deepfakes, festivalgoers attending this year’s Glastonbury can learn and take inspiration from an entire area specially dedicated to science.

Based in the festival’s Green Futures Field, Science Futures is co-ordinated by Lancaster University’s Professor Emma Sayer, and provides an area of discovery where people can explore many varied ways in which science shapes our lives.

Through a mix of innovative installations, games, music, discussions and demonstrations, Science Futures will offer a chance for people to find out about the science behind new discoveries. It will also provide unique opportunities for people to hear from, and meet, the approachable researchers tackling critical problems and those behind cutting-edge innovations.

The ‘Laboratory’ stage features a packed and varied line-up cutting across different fields of science and technology, including the ‘science behind the Arcadia spider’, Q&A sessions on climate change with Professor Richard Betts MBE of the University of Exeter and Met Office, discussions around the impacts of AI and Deepfakes, as well as music including a ‘Funk and Soil’ DJ set.

The ‘Futurarium’ marquee will host numerous stands and exhibits including an insightful demonstration of some of the highly specialist equipment used by the BBC Natural History Unit to capture their amazing footage of the natural world. Professor Gordon Blair and his team from Lancaster University and UKCEH will offer insights around the carbon footprint and sustainability of the technology and cloud computing we all use everyday called ‘How green is your cloud?’

‘The Sound Canopy’, created by Lancaster University’s Dr Liz Edwards, will take visitors on an audio journey from deep underground to outer space, while an outdoor exhibition called Science, Not Fiction will explore art’s role in science and science’s role in art.

“Running a science area at Glastonbury Festival is just the best thing in the world!” said Science Futures coordinator Professor Sayer.

“It’s fantastic to see how much people enjoy experiencing and discussing science when we swap the lecture theatre for somewhere like the Green Futures Field. The way we present research in Science Futures fits so well with the vibe of the festival – and people love it!”

Professor Betts will also be co-ordinating Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll, a decade-long science engagement collaboration, which started with support from the British Ecological Society and has gone from strength to strength thanks to the involvement of the Universities of Lancaster, Exeter, Oxford and Kent and the Met Office. The “Sex & Bugs” stall has been feature of the Green Futures Field at Glastonbury Festival since 2015.

Professor Betts said: “The Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll stall is always huge fun, we meet so many lovely, enthusiastic festival-goers and have some fantastic conversations about ecology and climate change. I can’t wait to be back!”

Shows on the Laboratory stage will include:

  • BBC Natural History Unit
  • Change the Earth Summit (Glasto Special) with Darren Jones MP
  • The Great Ape Challenge
  • Arcadia – The science behind the spider
  • Professor Richard Betts and guests – climate change Q&A
  • The Nature-Technology relationship with Professor Gordon Blair
  • Ask a scientist brunch
  • Beats of Science with DJ Mike Whitfield aka Funk and Soil
  • Climate songs from Rosie Eade “Folk Pixie”

Stalls at Science Futures will include:

  • Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll’s enthusiastic researchers want to share their fascination for the natural world and make science accessible to everyone. They love music and think scientists should be more approachable – so where better to have a bit of fun with science than at Glastonbury?
  • The Plant Power Station brings the science of sustainable agriculture to life, entertaining and engaging festivalgoers of all ages. In a beautiful marquee, welcoming scientists will lead visitors through a series of games and activities tackling important issues like pollination, pest management, carbon footprints, organic farming, GM crops and food sourcing.
  • The Circus of Climate Horrors explores the effects of a changing atmosphere through carnival sideshow games offering increasing difficulty as the world warms. Build a boat to float on the Sea of CO2; visitors will see for themselves how much gas is produced by everyday activities like driving, barbecuing, or boiling the kettle.

The art exhibition. ‘Science, not fiction’ will be an outside showcase of art in science, and science in art featuring contributions from 11 artists.

For the full Science Futures line-up – and exciting announcements as the festival approaches – follow @sci_futures on Twitter and Instagram.

Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll made its debut in 2013, from their homepage,

Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll brings environmental science to music festivals.

We’re a team of enthusiastic researchers who want to share our fascination for the natural world and make science accessible to everyone. We think scientists should be more approachable and we also love music – so where better to have a bit of fun with science than at music festivals?

Science is all about curiosity, so we do our best to recreate that spirit by turning interesting research into entertaining activities. Anyone can drop by our stall to chat, ask questions, or just take a look around and try their hand at a game or two.

Although planned as a one-off event to celebrate the Centenary of the British Ecological Society in 2013, Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll has been such a huge success that we continue to tour UK music festivals with our stall – complete with a live colony of bumblebees!

Here’s a video from the 2013 Wychwood Festival, from Sex & Bugs & Rock ‘n Roll homepage,

Getting back to Glastonbury 2025,

[downloaded from https://www.glastonburyfestivals.co.uk/areas/the-green-fields/green-futures/science-futures/]

The last time I featured science at the Glastonbury Festival was in a July 12, 2011 posting “Dirty science at Glastonbury” and, following up on my science and music theme, there was a July 27, 2015 posting “Science and music festivals such as Latitude 2015 and some Guerilla Science.”

Terminal 1

Strictly speaking, this art installation/situationist artwork is not science but the proposition strikes a chord given the rumblings about Canada’s border being an ‘imaginary line’ and the suggestion the country should be annexed by the US. From the 2025 Glastonbury Festival’s Terminal 1 webpage,

In a world where the lines drawn on a map by our ancestors have come to define and divide our world, this is a place without borders that celebrates our shared humanity. Unified by the simple message – NO-ONE IS ILLEGAL.

The Terminal is a deliberately slippery proposition. We are staffed by actors but we’re not ‘theatre’, we play films but we’re not a cinema, we are activists but won’t make you sign a petition. We also sell beer and dance but we’re not a club.

A walk-through situationist artwork disguised as an international airport. It is also angry. But serves its polemic with a side order of slapstick. 

Unlike President Donald Trump, these artists are not trying to turn the clock back to a time of uninhibited territorial expansion but making the point (as I understand it) that we are all living on and having to share one planet. It seems ironic that Trump and the artists are making the same claim about ‘imaginary lines’ while being entirely at cross purposes.

You can find out more about the music, etc. at the 2025 Glastonbury Festival website.

Canada’s Phoenix pay system, AI, the union and more (this is an update)

I last wrote about Canada’s Phoenix pay system in an August 20, 2024 posting “From the Phoenix payroll system to Dayforce? Hopefully an improvement for Canadian government employees—one day” when a new pay system was being discussed,

July 2024 update

A July 10, 2024 article by Emma Weller for CBC news online notes this,

A payroll system for federal workers intended to replace the much-maligned Phoenix platform is still years away from being fully implemented, according to a senior government official.

At a new conference on Tuesday [July 9, 2024], Alex Benay, associate deputy minister of Public Services and Procurement, said testing began on Phoenix’s replacement, Dayforce, in 2022.

“This is the year that we are building Dayforce as a replacement system for HR and pay and determining if it is a feasible solution for the Government of Canada,” Benay said. 

Benay said the switch won’t happen overnight, however, and cautioned it may take years until the new system is fully implemented. In the meantime, Phoenix will remain in use.

Brief background information

I have covered the debacle that is the implementation of the Canadian federal government’s disastrous implementation of the Phoenix pay system in early 2016 (see my December 27, 2019 post for a comprehensive overview). In 2019, there was a then new Minister of Digital Government, Joyce Murray. That position was eliminated in 2021 and Murray became the Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard leaving no one at the cabinet level in charge of ‘digital government’. Four years later, with the advent of Mark Carney as the Prime Minister of Canada, as of June 2025, there is now a Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Evan Solomon.

Early 2025

Early this year (2025) before the new government was elected, there were news reports suggesting that the Phoenix pay system situation had not improved much, from a January 24, 2025 article “Ottawa to tap AI to assist with Phoenix pay system backlog” by Adam Huras in the Vancouver Sun. p. NP6,

The federal government says it’s slowly inching closer to a permanent replacement of the controversial [emphasis mine] Phoenix pay system, with officials to decide by the end of March [2025] whether a new payroll platform can be implemented next year [2026] [emphasis mine].

But it will be another 18 months of configuration and testing to fully launch the change.

And the new system will likely also run in parallel with the existing one [emphasis mine] for another four to six months after that to ensure thing work they way they should.

That’s as massive backlogs persist.

An online dashboard last updated in December [2024] by the federal government shows a backlog of 388,00 transaction. That’s down from 416,000 last June [2024].

More than half 201,000 are more than a year old.

To help the federal government is expanding its use of artificial intelligence [AI] [emphasis mine], specifically a virtual assistant tool that helps fix data discrepancies in pay and compensation services.

That tool has bee in testing. With the help of 30 compensation advisers. …

Controversy? There is none. Even the contractor, IBM, advised against the implementation as the Phoenix pay system wasn’t tested in the field. Plus, there was no backup system in place. On a happier note, it seems that it’s being done differently this time.

There is more to the Phoenix pay system failure as Jamey Mills (regional executive vice-president for the Public Service Alliance of Canada, BC Region. PSAC) notes in her February 27, 2025 article for vancouverisawesome.com,

Trust is the foundation of any workplace. Workers commit to doing their jobs, and in return, they expect to be treated with respect and paid fairly. But for the past nine years, the federal government has broken that trust with its own workers.

Nine years ago, the federal government launched the Phoenix pay system, promising efficiency and accuracy. Instead, it delivered chaos. From the very start, workers reported missing paycheques, incorrect salaries, and severe financial hardship.

Nearly a decade later, the crisis remains unresolved, with more than 383,000 pay issues still in the backlog. The workers affected by Phoenix are not just numbers in a system—they are people with mortgages, bills, and families to support.

No one should have to worry about whether their next paycheque will arrive on time or in the right amount. But Phoenix is just one example of a broader issue: a pattern of neglect when it comes to supporting federal public service workers. Chronic understaffing, outsourcing, and budget cuts [emphasis mine] have put incredible strain on these workers, forcing them to do more with less while dealing with the ongoing stress of an unreliable payroll system. These are the same workers who process our passports, protect our borders, support veterans, inspect our food and transportation, and keep government programs running. They are the backbone of the public services we all depend on.

This isn’t just about solving the issues with this broken pay system. It’s about rebuilding trust in the federal government as an employer and ensuring that public service workers are valued, respected, and properly supported. When these workers are treated as an afterthought, it’s not just them who suffer—it’s every Canadian who relies on strong, well-functioning public services.

If the federal government wants to recruit and retain the best talent, it needs to do better. [emphasis mine] That starts with listening to workers, investing in stable and well-staffed public services, and fixing Phoenix once and for all.

Mills and, by extension, PSAC are not the only ones to note problems with the federal civil service. I’ve heard at least one political pundit stating that the federal civil service is ‘broken’, while notice was made that it was at one time considered excellent.

June 2025

Perhaps there’ll be some relief for employees, from a June 11, 2025 Public Services and Procurement Canada news release, Note: A link has been removed,

The Government of Canada is taking the next step toward replacing the Phoenix pay system to drive efficiency and effectiveness across government. 

Today, the Honourable Joël Lightbound, Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement, announced that the Government of Canada is moving forward to the final build and testing phase of the Dayforce HR and pay solution. This decision follows the completion of a rigorous feasibility study and marks a significant step toward modernizing the government’s HR and pay systems.

The Dayforce solution will replace a significant number of HR systems in use across the Government of Canada. It reflects the government’s continued commitment to business and digital transformation built on transparency, efficiency, and employee experience.

The Government of Canada will finalize the configuration and testing of Dayforce and work with departments to confirm their readiness to onboard. This phased approach builds on lessons learned and will help reduce risks associated with large-scale transformation and ensure a smooth transition for employees.

Employee engagement will continue to be a key focus throughout the transformation process. By involving employees in readiness activities and ensuring continuous feedback mechanisms, the government is implementing an HR and pay solution that offers an efficient people-centric platform aligned with workforce needs. 

Quotes

“The Government of Canada remains committed to modernizing its HR and pay systems in a responsible and transparent manner. By investing in the future of HR and pay, we are taking an important step forward in ensuring an efficient, secure, and sustainable solution for public service employees.”

The Honourable Joël Lightbound
Minister of Government Transformation, Public Works and Procurement

“We are excited to strengthen our partnership with the Government of Canada. Dayforce brings together advanced technologies into a single, AI-powered people platform designed to simplify processes and deliver real value. We are committed to supporting this transformative HR and pay initiative, ensuring it enhances work-life and drives meaningful improvements for government employees across the country.”

David Ossip
Chair and Chief Executive Officer of Dayforce, Inc.

Quick facts

  • The current pay system is used to deliver pay to an average of 431,000 current and former employees bi-weekly. In 2024, this represented approximately 13.4 million payments, totalling approximately $40.1 billion.
  • The complexity of the Government of Canada HR and pay environment includes the challenge of applying almost 150 different collective agreements representing employees from over 100 departments and agencies.
  • The initiative is incorporating lessons learned from the previous pay system implementation and recommendations intended to guide future projects of similar size and scope. In particular, recommendations around stakeholder engagement and governance were guided by Lessons Learned from the Transformation of Pay Administration Initiative (Goss Gilroy report).
  • Over 3,000 public servants participated in user awareness sessions during the feasibility project, with the majority of participants reporting that they found Dayforce simple and easy to use. Feedback from participants is being used to improve the system further. 
  • Dayforce is a global human capital management technology company with deep Canadian roots. Its single AI-powered people platform for HR, pay, time, talent and analytics is trusted by thousands of customers and serves millions of employees worldwide.      
  • Over the next 2 years, the deployment of the Dayforce solution will begin to progressively onboard starting with two departments and a separate agency, where the Government of Canada will focus on departmental readiness as it prepares to deploy the system. 

Josh Pringle’s June 12, 2025 article (with files from The Canadian Press and CTV News Ottawa’s William Eltherington and Ted Raymond) for CTV news online is a little less ebullient,

The days of the troubled Phoenix pay system appear to be numbered, as the federal government moves forward with implementing the new Dayforce system for human resources and payroll tasks.

Public Works and Procurement Minister Joël Lightbound announced Wednesday [June 11, 2025] that the government is moving ahead to the “final build and testing phase” of the Dayforce HR and pay solution for government employees, replacing the Phoenix system.

….

The Phoenix pay system was launched by the federal government in 2016. Since then, thousands of civil servants have been paid incorrectly by the pay system.

At least $3.5 billion has been spent by the government on the Phoenix pay system since 2017.

There were 327,000 transactions waiting to be processed through the Phoenix pay system, including 331,000 financial transactions and 9,000 transactions related to collective bargaining agreements. The government’s website shows 49 per cent of the outstanding transactions are over a year old.

In 2018, the government announced plans to replace the Phoenix pay system. More than $150 million has been spent looking into a new platform to replace the pay system.

Sharon DeSousa, national president for the Public Service Alliance of Canada, said in a statement the new pay system must be proven to work.

“After everything our members have been through at the hands of the Phoenix disaster [emphasis mine], the next pay system has to work, and it has to work from day one. That’s why PSAC is at the table asking the tough questions — to prevent another pay system disaster,” DeSousa said. “This isn’t just a tech upgrade — it’s about rebuilding trust. That starts with paying workers accurately and on time, every time. It’s the most basic obligation of any employer.”

She added that the government must not ignore the ongoing issues with Phoenix.

“With 327,000 outstanding cases, stabilizing the current system and hiring enough compensation advisors to handle pay issues has to be a top priority.”

I wish them well with their efforts to finally make bring this Phoenix pay system debacle to an end.

It is a bit curious to me that there isn’t a quote from Evan Solomon, Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, in a government news release where there’s a major initiative involving the use of artificial intelligence.

World’s largest and most powerful pulsed magnet system completed—ITER and fusion energy + local fusion news

Before launching into the news, I have a few explanatory bits, which can be easily skipped.

Fusion energy

There’s a lot of interest in fusion energy, a form of nuclear energy, that promises to be sustainable and ‘clean’. Adam Stein’s May 29, 2024 article “Nuclear fusion: the true, the false and the uncertain” for Polytechique insights (Institut polytechnique de Paris) tempers some of the enthusiasm/hype about fusion energy. In this excerpt, he examines claims about ‘clean’ energy, Note: A link has been removed,

#2 Fusion will become a source of clean, limitless energy

TRUE — Fusion is generally seen as “clean” energy.

It produces substantially less radioactive “waste” than fission – though it is possible that with emerging technologies, waste from fusion and fission could be reused. Still, like other nuclear fission, fusion will require appropriate and comprehensive oversight. One concern is that the reaction could be used to generate fissile materials usable in weapons. Fusion machines and related reactions do not directly produce material useful for weapons. The reaction does, however, create an enormous amount of neutrons.

On the bright side, these neutrons could help generate more fuel for the fusion reaction — many designs plan to incorporate a “breeding blanket,” a layer of materials that acts as heat insulation, but is also lined with materials that can capture the neutrons to create more tritium. Uranium or thorium could also be placed in some breeding blanket designs. The concern is that these materials, once irradiated, could generate uranium-235 that can be used in nuclear weapons. Physical ways to deter this process exist, such as requiring the use of lithium‑6 in the blanket modules. The IAEA [International Atomic Energy Agency] will be important in ensuring non-proliferation safeguards and oversight.

ITER

The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is (from its Wikipedia entry), Note: Links have been removed,

ITER (initially the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, iter meaning “the way” or “the path” in Latin)[4][5][6] is an international nuclear fusion research and engineering megaproject aimed at creating energy through a fusion process similar to that of the Sun. It is being built next to the Cadarache facility in southern France.[7][8] Upon completion of the main reactor and first plasma, planned for 2033–2034,[9][10] ITER will be the largest of more than 100 fusion reactors built since the 1950s, with six times the plasma volume of JT-60SA in Japan, the largest tokamak operating today.[11][12][13]

The long-term goal of fusion research is to generate electricity; ITER’s stated purpose is scientific research, and technological demonstration of a large fusion reactor, without electricity generation.[14][11] ITER’s goals are to achieve enough fusion to produce 10 times as much thermal output power as thermal power absorbed by the plasma for short time periods; to demonstrate and test technologies that would be needed to operate a fusion power plant including cryogenics, heating, control and diagnostics systems, and remote maintenance; to achieve and learn from a burning plasma; to test tritium breeding; and to demonstrate the safety of a fusion plant.[12][8]

ITER is funded and operated by seven member parties: China, the European Union, India, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. In the immediate aftermath of Brexit, the United Kingdom continued to participate in ITER through the EU’s Fusion for Energy (F4E) program until September 2023.[15][1][2] Switzerland participated through Euratom and F4E until 2021,[16] though it is poised to rejoin in 2026 following subsequent negotiations with the EU.[17][18] ITER also has cooperation agreements with Australia, Canada, Kazakhstan and Thailand.[19]

Construction of the ITER complex in France started in 2013,[20] and assembly of the tokamak began in 2020.[21] The initial budget was close to €6 billion, but the total price of construction and operations is projected to be from €18 to €22 billion;[22][23] other estimates place the total cost between $45 billion and $65 billion, though these figures are disputed by ITER.[24][25] Regardless of the final cost, ITER has already been described as the most expensive science experiment of all time,[26] the most complicated engineering project in human history,[27] and one of the most ambitious human collaborations since the development of the International Space Station (€100 billion or $150 billion budget) and the Large Hadron Collider (€7.5 billion budget).[note 1][28][29]

ITER’s planned successor, the EUROfusion-led DEMO, is expected to be one of the first fusion reactors to produce electricity in an experimental environment.[30]

Tokamak

As this comes up again in the next section, here’s more about the tokamak from its Wikipedia entry, Note: Links have been removed,

A tokamak (/ˈtoʊkəmæk/; Russian: токамáк) is a device which uses a powerful magnetic field generated by external magnets to confine plasma in the shape of an axially symmetrical torus.[1] The tokamak is one of several types of magnetic confinement devices being developed to produce controlled thermonuclear fusion power. The tokamak concept is currently one of the leading candidates for a practical fusion reactor for providing minimally polluting electrical power.[2]

Now, the ITER news

An April 30, 2025 news item on phys.org announces a new development at ITER,

In a landmark achievement for fusion energy, ITER has completed all components for the world’s largest, most powerful pulsed superconducting electromagnet system.

ITER is an international collaboration of more than 30 countries to demonstrate the viability of fusion—the power of the sun and stars—as an abundant, safe, carbon-free energy source for the planet.

An April 30, 2025 ITER press release on EurekAlert, which originated the news item, provides more details about the achievement,

The final component was the sixth module of the Central Solenoid, built and tested in the United States. When it is assembled at the ITER site in Southern France, the Central Solenoid will be the system’s most powerful magnet, strong enough to lift an aircraft carrier.

The Central Solenoid will work in tandem with six ring-shaped Poloidal Field (PF) magnets, built and delivered by Russia, Europe, and China.

The fully assembled pulsed magnet system will weigh nearly 3,000 tons. It will function as the electromagnetic heart of ITER’s donut-shaped reactor, called a Tokamak.

How does this pulsed superconducting electromagnet system work?

Step 1. A few grams of hydrogen fuel—deuterium and tritium gas—are injected into ITER’s gigantic Tokamak chamber.

Step 2. The pulsed magnet system sends an electrical current to ionize the hydrogen gas, creating a plasma, a cloud of charged particles.

Step 3. The magnets create an “invisible cage” that confines and shapes the ionized plasma.

Step 4. External heating systems raise the plasma temperature to 150 million degrees Celsius, ten times hotter than the core of the sun. 

Step 5. At this temperature, the atomic nuclei of plasma particles combine and fuse, releasing massive heat energy.

A tenfold energy gain

At full operation, ITER is expected to produce 500 megawatts of fusion power from only 50 megawatts of input heating power, a tenfold gain. At this level of efficiency, the fusion reaction largely self-heats, becoming a “burning plasma.”

By integrating all the systems needed for fusion at industrial scale, ITER is serving as a massive, complex research laboratory for its 30-plus member countries, providing the knowledge and data needed to optimize commercial fusion power.

A global model

ITER’s geopolitical achievement is also remarkable: the sustained collaboration of ITER’s seven members—China, Europe, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United States. Thousands of scientists and engineers have contributed components from hundreds of factories on three continents to build a single machine. 

Pietro Barabaschi, ITER Director-General, says, “What makes ITER unique is not only its technical complexity but the framework of international cooperation that has sustained it through changing political landscapes.”

“This achievement proves that when humanity faces existential challenges like climate change and energy security, we can overcome national differences to advance solutions.” 

“The ITER Project is the embodiment of hope. With ITER, we show that a sustainable energy future and a peaceful path forward are possible.” 

Major progress

In 2024, ITER reached 100 percent of its construction targets. With most of the major components delivered, the ITER Tokamak is now in assembly phase. In April 2025, the first vacuum vessel sector module was inserted into the Tokamak Pit, about 3 weeks ahead of schedule.

Extending collaboration to the private sector

The past five years have witnessed a surge in private sector investment in fusion energy R&D. In November 2023, the ITER Council recognized the value and opportunity represented by this trend. 

They encouraged the ITER Organization and its Domestic Agencies to actively engage with the private sector, to transfer ITER’s accumulated knowledge to accelerate progress toward making fusion a reality.

In 2024, ITER launched a private sector fusion engagement project, with multiple channels for sharing knowledge, documentation, data, and expertise, as well as collaboration on R&D. This tech transfer initiative includes sharing information on ITER’s global fusion supply chain, another way to return value to Member governments and their companies.

In April 2025, ITER hosted a public-private workshop to collaborate on the best technological innovation to solve fusion’s remaining challenges.

The ITER experiment under construction in southern France. The tokamak building is the mirrored structure at center. Courtesy ITER Organization/EJF Riche.


How have ITER’s Members contributed to this achievement?

Under the ITER Agreement, Members contribute most of the cost of building ITER in the form of building and supplying components. This arrangement means that financing from each Member goes primarily to their own companies, to manufacture ITER’s challenging technology. In doing so, these companies also drive innovation and gain expertise, creating a global fusion supply chain.

Europe, as the Host Member, contributes 45 percent of the cost of the ITER Tokamak and its support systems. China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United States each contribute 9 percent, but all Members get access to 100 percent of the intellectual property.

United States

The United States has built the Central Solenoid, made of six modules, plus a spare. 

The U.S. has also delivered to ITER the “exoskeleton” support structure that will enable the Central Solenoid to withstand the extreme forces it will generate. The exoskeleton is comprised of more than 9,000 individual parts, manufactured by eight U.S. suppliers.

Additionally, the U.S. has fabricated about 8 percent of the Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductors used in ITER’s Toroidal Field magnets.

Russia

Russia has delivered the 9-meter-diameter ring-shaped Poloidal Field magnet that will crown the top of the ITER Tokamak.

Working closely with Europe, Russia has also produced approximately 120 tonnes of Niobium-Titanium (NbTi) superconductors, comprising about 40 percent of the total required for ITER’s Poloidal Field magnets.

Additionally, Russia has produced about 20 percent of the Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductors for ITER’s Toroidal Field magnets.

And Russia has manufactured the giant busbars that will deliver power to the magnets at the required voltage and amperage, as well as the upper port plugs for ITER’s vacuum vessel sectors.

Europe

Europe has manufactured four of the ring-shaped Poloidal Field magnets onsite in France, ranging from 17 to 24 meters in diameter. 

Europe has worked closely with Russia to manufacture the Niobium-Titanium (NbTi) superconductors used in PF magnets 1 and 6. 

Europe has also delivered 10 of ITER’s Toroidal Field magnets and has produced a substantial portion of the Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductors used in these TF magnets. 

And Europe is creating five of the nine sectors of the Tokamak vacuum vessel, the donut-shaped chamber where fusion will take place.

China

China, under an arrangement with Europe, has manufactured a 10-metre Poloidal Field magnet. It has already been installed at the bottom of the partially assembled ITER Tokamak. 

China has also contributed the Niobium-Titanium (NbTi) superconductors for PF magnets 2, 3, 4, and 5, about 65 percent of the PF magnet total—plus about 8 percent of the Toroidal Field magnet superconductors. 

Additionally, China is contributing 18 superconducting Correction Coil magnets, positioned around the Tokamak to fine-tune the plasma reactions. 

China has delivered the 31 magnet feeders, the multi-lane thruways that will deliver the electricity to power ITER’s electromagnets as well as the liquid helium to cool the magnets to -269 degrees Celsius, the temperature needed for superconductivity.

Japan

Japan has produced and sent to the United States the 43 kilometers of Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductor strand that was used to create the Central Solenoid modules.

Japan has also produced 8 of the 18 Toroidal Field (TF) magnets, plus a spare—as well as all the casing structures for the TF magnets.

Japan also produced 25 percent of the Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductors that went into the Toroidal Field magnets.

Korea

Korea has produced the tooling used to pre-assemble ITER’s largest components, enabling ITER to fit the Toroidal Field coils and thermal shields to the vacuum vessel sectors with millimetric precision. 

Korea has also manufactured 20 percent of the Niobium-Tin (Nb3Sn) superconductors for the Toroidal Field magnets.

Additionally, Korea has manufactured the thermal shields that provide a physical barrier between the ultra-hot fusion plasma and the ultra-cold magnets. 

And Korea has delivered four of the nine sectors of the Tokamak vacuum vessel.

India

India has fabricated the ITER Cryostat, the 30-metre high, 30-metre diameter thermos that houses the entire ITER Tokamak.

India has also provided the cryolines that distribute the liquid helium to cool ITER’s magnets. 

Additionally, India has been responsible for delivering ITER’s cooling water system, the in-wall shielding of the Tokamak, and multiple parts of the external plasma heating systems.

In total, ITER’s magnet systems will comprise 10,000 tons of superconducting magnets, with a combined stored magnetic energy of 51 Gigajoules. The raw material to fabricate these magnets consisted of more than 100,000 kilometers of superconducting strand, fabricated in 9 factories in six countries.

* * *

What are the technical specifications for each of ITER’s magnet systems?

Central Solenoid (cylindrical magnet)

Height: 18 meters (59 feet)
Diameter: 4.25 meters (14 feet)
Weight: ~1,000 tonnes
Magnetic field strength: 13 Tesla (280,000 times stronger than the Earth’s magnetic field)
Stored magnetic energy: 6.4 Gigajoules
Will initiate and sustain a plasma current of 15 MA for 300-500 second pulses
Fabricated in the United States
Material: Niobium-tin (Nb₃Sn) superconducting strand produced in Japan
Cooling: operated at 4.5 Kelvin (-269°C) using liquid helium cryogenics to maintain superconductivity
Structure (exoskeleton): built to withstand 100 MN (meganewtons) of force—equivalent to twice the thrust of a space shuttle launch.

Poloidal Field Magnets (ring-shaped magnets)

Diameters: varying in range from 9 meters (PF1) to 10 meters (PF6) to 17 meters (PF2, PF5) to 25 meters (PF3, PF4)
Weight: from 160 to 400 tonnes
Fabricated in Russia, Europe (France) and China
Material: niobium-titanium (NbTi) superconducting strand produced in Europe, China, and Russia
Cooling: operated at 4.5 Kelvin (-269°C) using liquid helium cryogenics to maintain superconductivity

Toroidal Field Coils (D-shaped magnets, completed in late 2023)

Each coil: 17 meters high × 9 meters wide
Weight: ~360 tonnes each
Fabricated in Europe (Italy) and Japan
Material: niobium-tin (Nb3Sn) superconducting strand produced in Europe, Korea, Russia, and the United States
Cooling: operated at 4.5 Kelvin (-269°C) using liquid helium to maintain superconductivity

Correction Coils and Magnet Feeders

Correction Coils: manufactured by China; critical for fine plasma stability adjustments.
Magnet Feeders: deliver cryogenics, electrical power, and instrumentation signals to the magnets; also produced by China

Vancouver’s (Canada) General Fusion news

Recently, there have been some big ups and downs for General Fusion as this May 5, 2025 General Fusion news release written as an open letter from the company’s Chief Executive Office (CEO), Greg Twinney

General Fusion has been at the forefront of fusion technology development for more than 20 years. Today, we stand as a world leader on the cusp of our most exciting technical milestone yet—and one of the most challenging financial moments in our history. We are closer than ever to delivering practical fusion, but success depends on securing the right financing partners to carry this breakthrough forward. 

On April 29th [2025], we achieved a transformative milestone at our Vancouver, B.C., headquarters in Canada—we successfully compressed a large-scale magnetized plasma with lithium using our world-first LM26 fusion demonstration machine. The full, integrated system and diagnostics operated safely and as designed, and an early review of the data indicates we saw ion temperature and density increase, and our lithium liner successfully trapped the magnetic field. This was an incredible success for our first shot! What does this mean? From a technology perspective, we’re one step closer to bringing zero-carbon fusion energy to the electricity grid using our unique, home-grown Canadian technology that global industry leaders recognize as one of the most practical for commercialization.   

Our incredible, innovative, and nimble team achieved these results about a year and a half after we launched the LM26 fusion demonstration program—designing, building, commissioning, optimizing, and operating on a rapid timeline with constrained capital. LM26 is the only machine of its kind in the world, designed and built to achieve the technical results required to scale a fusion technology to a practical power plant. It is backed by peer-reviewed scientific results published in 2024 and 2025 issues of Nuclear Fusion, making us one of only four private fusion companies in the world to have achieved and published meaningful fusion results on the path to scientific breakeven. We are also the only one with the machine already built to get there. Truly, there has never been a more promising time to be at—or invest in—General Fusion.  

General Fusion has been around the block. We’ve proven a lot with a lean budget. We’re not a shiny new start-up with a drawing and a dream; we are experienced fusioneers with a clear view of the path to success and the machine to prove it. We’ve built a global network of partners and early adopters focused on a fusion technology—Magnetized Target Fusion—that is durable, cost-effective, fuel-sustainable, and practical. We are ready to execute our plan but are caught in an economic and geopolitical environment that is forcing us to wait.  

Keeping a fusion company funded in today’s world requires more than just meaningful capital. It takes ambition, steadfast patience, a bold national vision aligned with the opportunity, and constant refreshing of the investor base as timelines stretch beyond typical fund horizons. Our mission has historically been supported financially by a mix of strong private investors and the Canadian federal government. We have been competing against aggressive nationally funded fusion programs around the world. We have risen to global leadership by charting a distinct course—founded on entrepreneurship and commercial focus—while others follow government-led or academic pathways. However, today’s funding landscape is more challenging than ever as investors and governments navigate a rapidly shifting and uncertain political and market climate.  

This rapidly shifting environment has directly and immediately impacted our funding. Therefore, as a result of unexpected and urgent financing constraints, we are taking action now to protect our future with our game-changing technology and IP—including reducing both the size of our team and LM26 operations—while we navigate this difficult environment. We’re doing what resilient teams do and what we have done before: refocus, protect what matters, and keep building. 

While this is a challenging time for General Fusion, it is also an attractive opportunity for those with the financial means to transform the world. Everything is in place—the technology, science, LM26, and the know-how and passion. All we need now is the capital to finish the job. We are opening our doors and actively seeking strategic options with investors, buyers, governments, and others who share our vision. Reach out now and become part of the future of energy. 

Greg Twinney

Chief Executive Officer
General Fusion, Inc.

Twinney also gave a May 8, 2025 radio interview(approximately 7 mins.) to Stephen Quinn of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation’s (CBC) Early Edition.

May 8, 2025

General Fusion CEO, Greg Twinney tells Stephen Quinn how his company has made big breakthroughs in fusion energy – and how market chaos caused by President Trump has made it hard to find investors.

The interview provides an introduction to fusion energy and the company while this May 5, 2025 article by John Fingas for Betakit fills in some details, Note: Links have been removed,

In a statement, General Fusion told BetaKit it was looking for $125 million USD (about $172.7 million CAD) to fulfill its goals. While the company didn’t share the scope of the layoffs, The Globe and Mail reported that the company let go of a quarter of staff.

General Fusion created its first magnetized plasma, which is needed for its fusion reactions, at its LM26 demonstration facility in March [2025], and conducted a large-scale test on April 29. It still plans to create plasma at a hotter 10 million C within months, and eventually to reach the 100-million-degree mark needed to achieve a “scientific breakeven equivalent” where LM26 could generate more energy than required for the reaction.

The company ultimately hopes to deploy reactors based on its Magnetized Target Fusion technology, which creates fusion conditions in short pulses, by the mid-2030s. The technique theoretically costs less than the lasers or superconducting magnets used in designs like Tokamak reactors, and could be used in facilities close to the cities they serve. One 300-megawatt electrical plant powered by fusion could provide enough continuous power for 150,000 Canadian homes, the company claims.

The company has raised about $440 million CAD so far, including $69 million from the Government of Canada. Some of its private investors include Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, Shopify founder Tobi Lütke, and engineering consultancy Hatch. Bob Smith, the former CEO of Bezos’s spaceflight company Blue Origin, became a strategic advisor for General Fusion in early April [2025].

“We’re not a shiny new startup with a drawing and a dream; we are experienced fusioneers with a clear view of the path to success and the machine to prove it,” he [Greg Twinney, General Fusion CEO] said.

It seems logical to follow with this:

Business investments and fusion energy

First, here’s more about the agency, which released a 2025 report on investments in fusion energy. The European Union (EU) has created an organization known as Fusion for Energy (F4E), from its Wikipedia entry, Note: Links have been removed,

Fusion for Energy (F4E) is a joint undertaking of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) that is responsible for the EU’s contribution to the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), the world’s largest scientific partnership aiming to demonstrate fusion as a viable and sustainable source of energy. The organisation is officially named European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy and was created under article 45 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community by the decision of the Council of the European Union on 27 March 2007 for a period of 35 years.[1]

F4E recently released a report “Global investment in fusion private sector, 1st edition, Cutoff: 10 June 2025,” from the June 12, 2025 F4E press release,

The F4E Fusion Observatory has published its first-ever report, an analysis of global investment in the fusion private sector. Based on a collection of all available data, the analysis provides a picture of who is investing and where, showing rapid growth and significant geographical differences.

The figures reveal a sharp increase in investments in fusion start-ups in recent years. The total amount has grown from just over 1.5 billion EUR in 2020 to an estimated 9.9 billion EUR at present (June 2025), doubling in the last two years alone [emphasis mine]. The investment remains concentrated in the US, host of most private companies (38 out of 67), absorbing 60% of global funding. China comes second at 25%, with fewer projects (6) backed by large public funds [emphasis mine].

Meanwhile, Europe takes a smaller share of investment (5%) [emphasis mine], with Germany leading the continent at 460 M EUR million,  just above the UK, at 416 M EUR. Among the EU’s seven private companies, the largest sums are received by Marvel Fusion and Focused Energy. F4E can support these emerging players by leveraging on its experience in large projects and knowledge of the market. For this purpose, F4E has an ongoing call inviting EU-based private fusion initiatives to collaborate.

The analysis goes on to present the origin and profile of the investors. While US funding is largely led by venture capital firms or big tech, those in the EU show a more even distribution between public and private investors.

As for the kinds of fusion concepts, magnetic confinement takes the lion’s share of global investment, at €6,1 billion, predominantly for Tokamaks (doughnut-shaped devices, similar to ITER). However, in Europe, inertial confinement technologies are the most funded in the private sector.

By contrast, when considering the public funding used for the in-kind contributions to ITER, the geographic distribution is rebalanced. The €6.8 billion invested by F4E in the EU supply chain is larger than other regions due to the EU’s larger share of the ITER project. This contribution has shaped a strong European industry, capable of delivering complex technologies for fusion. That said, investment in the supply chain, while substantial, has a different impact than equity in a fast-scaling fusion company.

The findings of the report will be discussed at the F4E Roundtable, a key stakeholder forum hosted this week by F4E in Barcelona. With these data-based insights, the F4E Observatory aims to support the policy conversation and help steer it towards the future EU fusion strategy.

Download the report here

It seems that Canadian fusion efforts are not on the EU’s radar.

Wrapping up

To state the obvious, it’s an exciting and volatile time. In addition to this latest breakthrough at ITER, my April 11, 2025 posting “The nuclear fusion energy race” covers some of what were then the latest international technical breakthroughs along with some coverage of how President Donald Trump’s tariffs were creating uncertainty for investors and, also, Bob Smith’s, former CEO of Jeff Bezos’ spaceflight company Blue Origin, recent appointment as a strategic advisor for General Fusion.

I wish General Fusion good luck in finding new investors and, while it’s not a perfect energy solution, I wish all the researchers the best as they race to find ways to produce energy more sustainably.

One last comment, it’s easy to forget in a time when Russia is conducting a war with Ukraine and Israel is conducting an ever evolving action against Palestine, Iran, and more that cooperation amongst ‘enemies’ is possible. The list of ITER full members (United States, Russia, Europe, China, Japan, Korea, India, Note: There are other member categories) is a reminder that even countries that often work at cross purposes can work together.

‘Super-Turing AI’ uses less energy to mimic brain

Neuromorphic (brainlike) engineering and neuromorphic computing being long time interests here, this March 26, 2025 new item on ScienceDaily caught my eye,

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can perform complex calculations and analyze data faster than any human, but to do so requires enormous amounts of energy. The human brain is also an incredibly powerful computer, yet it consumes very little energy.

As technology companies increasingly expand, a new approach to AI’s “thinking,” developed by researchers including Texas A&M University engineers, mimics the human brain and has the potential to revolutionize the AI industry.

A March 25, 2025 Texas A&M University news release (also on EurekAlert) by Lesley Henton, which originated the news item, delves further into the creation of a “Super-Turing AI,” Note: Links have been removed,

As technology companies increasingly expand, a new approach to AI’s “thinking,” developed by researchers including Texas A&M University engineers, mimics the human brain and has the potential to revolutionize the AI industry.

Dr. Suin Yi, assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at Texas A&M’s College of Engineering, is on a team of researchers that developed “Super-Turing AI,” which operates more like the human brain. This new AI integrates certain processes instead of separating them and then migrating huge amounts of data like current systems do.

The Energy Crisis In AI

Today’s AI systems, including large language models [LLM] such as OpenAI [a company not an LLM] and ChatGPT [an LLM produced by OpenAI], require immense computing power and are housed in expansive data centers that consume vast amounts of electricity.

“These data centers are consuming power in gigawatts, whereas our brain consumes 20 watts,” Suin explained. “That’s 1 billion watts compared to just 20. Data centers that are consuming this energy are not sustainable with current computing methods. So while AI’s abilities are remarkable, the hardware and power generation needed to sustain it is still needed.”

The substantial energy demands not only escalate operational costs but also raise environmental concerns, given the carbon footprint associated with large-scale data centers. As AI becomes more integrated, addressing its sustainability becomes increasingly critical.

Emulating The Brain

Yi and team believe the key to solving this problem lies in nature — specifically, the human brain’s neural processes.

In the brain, the functions of learning and memory are not separated, they are integrated. Learning and memory rely on connections between neurons, called “synapses,” where signals are transmitted. Learning strengthens or weakens synaptic connections through a process called “synaptic plasticity,” forming new circuits and altering existing ones to store and retrieve information. 

By contrast, in current computing systems, training (how the AI is taught) and memory (data storage) happen in two separate places within the computer hardware. Super-Turing AI is revolutionary because it bridges this efficiency gap, so the computer doesn’t have to migrate enormous amounts of data from one part of its hardware to another.

“Traditional AI models rely heavily on backpropagation — a method used to adjust neural networks during training,” Yi said. “While effective, backpropagation is not biologically plausible and is computationally intensive.

“What we did in that paper is troubleshoot the biological implausibility present in prevailing machine learning algorithms,” he said. “Our team explores mechanisms like Hebbian learning and spike-timing-dependent plasticity — processes that help neurons strengthen connections in a way that mimics how real brains learn.”

Hebbian learning principles are often summarized as “cells that fire together, wire together.” This approach aligns more closely with how neurons in the brain strengthen their connections based on activity patterns. By integrating such biologically inspired mechanisms, the team aims to develop AI systems that require less computational power without compromising performance.

In a test, a circuit using these components helped a drone navigate a complex environment — without prior training — learning and adapting on the fly. This approach was faster, more efficient and used less energy than traditional AI.

Why This Matters For The Future Of AI

This research could be a game-changer for the AI industry. Companies are racing to build larger and more powerful AI models, but their ability to scale is limited by hardware and energy constraints. In some cases, new AI applications require building entire new data centers, further increasing environmental and economic costs.

Yi emphasizes that innovation in hardware is just as crucial as advancements in AI systems themselves. “Many people say AI is just a software thing, but without computing hardware, AI cannot exist,” he said.

Looking Ahead: Sustainable AI Development

Super-Turing AI represents a pivotal step toward sustainable AI development. By reimagining AI architectures to mirror the efficiency of the human brain, the industry can address both economic and environmental challenges.

Yi and his team hope that their research will lead to a new generation of AI that is both smarter and more efficient.

“Modern AI like ChatGPT is awesome, but it’s too expensive. We’re going to make sustainable AI,” Yi said. “Super-Turing AI could reshape how AI is built and used, ensuring that as it continues to advance, it does so in a way that benefits both people and the planet.”

There’s no mention of a memristor but there is a ‘synaptic resistor’, which I find puzzling. Is a synaptic resistor something different? In a search with these search terms “synaptic resistor memristor” I found this,

The term “memristive synapses” signifies the amalgamation of memristor functionality with synaptic characteristics, resulting in a novel approach to neuromorphic computing.

I’m guessing memristive synapses can also be called synaptic resistors or, at the least, are related concepts.

I pulled the definition from,

Resistive Switching Properties in Memristors for Optoelectronic Synaptic Memristors: Deposition Techniques, Key Performance Parameters, and Applications by Rajwali Khan, Naveed Ur Rehman, Shahid Iqbal, Sherzod Abdullaev, and Haila M. Aldosari. ACS Applied Electronic Materials Vol 6/ Issue 1 pp. 73–119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.3c01323 Published December 29, 2023 Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under
CC-BY 4.0

Getting back to this latest work from Texas A&M University, here’s a link to and a citation for Dr. Suin Yi and his team’s paper,

HfZrO-based synaptic resistor circuit for a Super-Turing intelligent system by Jungmin Lee, Rahul Shenoy, Atharva Deo, Suin Yi, Dawei Gao, David Qiao, Mingjie Xu, Shiva Asapu, Zixuan Rong, Dhruva Nathan, Yong Hei, Dharma Paladugu, Jian-Guo Zheng, J. Joshua Yang, R. Stanley Williams, Qing Wu, and Yong Chen. Science Advances 28 Feb 2025 Vol 11, Issue 9 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr2082

This paper is open access.

Notice that one of the Super Turing paper’s authors is R. Stanley Williams who ‘discovered’ the memristor in 2008. You can read his November 28, 2008 article “How We Found the Missing Memristor; The memristor—the functional equivalent of a synapse—could revolutionize circuit design” in the IEEE Spectrum online,

It’s time to stop shrinking. Moore’s Law, the semiconductor industry’s obsession with the shrinking of transistors and their commensurate steady doubling on a chip about every two years, has been the source of a 50-year technical and economic revolution. Whether this scaling paradigm lasts for five more years or 15, it will eventually come to an end. The emphasis in electronics design will have to shift to devices that are not just increasingly infinitesimal but increasingly capable.

Earlier this year, I and my colleagues at Hewlett-Packard Labs, in Palo Alto, Calif., surprised the electronics community with a fascinating candidate for such a device: the memristor. It had been theorized nearly 40 years ago, but because no one had managed to build one, it had long since become an esoteric curiosity. That all changed on 1 May [2008], when my group published the details of the memristor in Nature.

For anyone interested in a trip down memory road, I have a few comments from the theorist (Leon Chua) mentioned in his 2008 article in this April 13, 2010 posting (scroll down to the ‘More on memristors’ subhead).

3D nanotech blankets for clean drinking water?

A March 24, 2025 news item on ScienceDaily announces a new technique for removing pollutants from water (aka, water remediation),

Researchers have developed a new material that, by harnessing the power of sunlight, can clear water of dangerous pollutants.

Created through a combination of soft chemistry gels and electrospinning — a technique where electrical force is applied to liquid to craft small fibers — the team constructed thin fiber-like strips of titanium dioxide (TiO₂), a compound often utilized in solar cells, gas sensors and various self-cleaning technologies.

A March 24, 2025 Ohio State University (OSU) news release (also on EurekAlert), which originated the news item, delves further into the topic, Note: Links have been removed,

Despite being a great alternative energy source, solar fuel systems that utilize TiO₂ nanoparticles are often power-limited because they can only undergo photocatalysis, or create chemical reactions, by absorbing non-visible UV light. This can cause significant challenges to implementation, including low efficiency and the need for complex filtration systems. 

Yet when researchers added copper to the material to improve this process, their new structures, called nanomats, were able to absorb enough light energy to break down harmful pollutants in air and water, said Pelagia-Irene Gouma, lead author of the study and a professor of materials science and engineering at The Ohio State University. 

“There hasn’t been an easy way to create something like a blanket that you can lay on water and start creating energy,” she said. “But we are the only ones who have made these structures and the only ones to demonstrate that they actually work.”

The study was recently published in the journal Advanced Science. 

When titanium dioxide absorbs light, electrons are formed that oxidize water and attack pollutants, slowly destroying them until they become benign. When copper is added, that process is supercharged, making it even more effective. 

To determine this, researchers worked to characterize the nanomat’s updated properties to understand how it behaved and what made it different from other self-cleaning nanoparticles, said Gouma. Surprisingly, researchers found that compared to traditional solar cells, these nanomats can be more successful at power generation when placed under natural sunlight, she said.

“These nanomats can be used as a power generator, or as water remediation tools,” she said. “In both ways, you have a catalyst with the highest efficiency reported to date.”

These lightweight, easy-to-remove fiber mats can float and operate atop any body of water and are even reusable through multiple cleaning cycles. Because nanomats are so effective, researchers envision that they could be used to rid water of industrial pollutants in developing countries, turning otherwise contaminated rivers and lakes into sources of clean drinking water. 

Additionally, because this technology doesn’t generate any toxic byproducts like some solar cell systems, nanomats are extremely environmentally friendly. “It’s a safe material, it won’t hurt anything, and it’s as clean as it can be,” said Gouma. 

Still, although this team’s technology is incredibly efficient, how long it will take to scale up commercially depends on how quickly industries take notice of the product. “We have the tools to make them in large quantities and translate them to various industries,” said Gouma. “The only limitation is that it needs someone to take advantage of these abundant resources.”

Overall, the study’s findings suggest that nanomats could be a promising tool in many future photocatalytic applications, including long-term sustainability efforts like environmental remediation as well as solar-driven hydrogen production. 

In the meantime, the team plans to examine ways to optimize the material further. 

“This material is completely novel in terms of a new form of nanotechnology,” said Gouma. “It’s really impressive and something that we are very excited about.”

Other Ohio State co-authors include Fateh Mikaeilia and Mohammad Mahafuzur Rahaman. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation. 

Here’s a citation for and a link to the paper,

3D Self-Supported Visible Light Photochemical Nanocatalysts by Fateh Mikaeili, Mohammad Mahafuzur Rahaman, Pelagia-Irene (Perena) Gouma. Advanced Science Online Version of Record before inclusion in an issue 2502981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202502981 First published: 24 March 2025

This paper is open access.