Tag Archives: gene-editing

Gene-editing tools like CRISPR unlock promising new topical treatments for the first time for skin diseases

Exciting? Yes. However, as far as I can tell, hey are a long way from human clinical trials. Onto the good news, from a January 27, 2026 University of British Columbia (UBC) news release (can be found here at the Life Science Institute, here at the Faculty of Medicine, and here at the university’s press office), Note: Links have been removed,

Gene-editing tools like CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) have unlocked new treatments for previously uncurable diseases. Now, researchers at the University of British Columbia are extending those possibilities to the skin for the first time.

The UBC team, together with researchers from the Berlin Institute of Health at Charité in Germany, has developed the first gene therapy capable of correcting faulty genes when applied directly to human skin. Outlined today [January 27, 2926] in a paper published in Cell Stem Cell, the breakthrough could lead to new treatments for a wide range of genetic skin conditions, from rare inherited diseases to more common disorders like eczema.

“With this work, we show that it is possible to correct disease-causing mutations in human skin using a topical treatment that is safe, scalable and easy-to-use,” said Dr. Sarah Hedtrich, an associate professor at UBC’s school of biomedical engineering and senior author of the study. “Importantly, the approach corrects the root cause of disease, and our data suggests that a one-time treatment might even be enough to provide a lasting and durable cure.”

Broad therapeutic potential 

In the study, the researchers show the gene therapy can correct the most common genetic mutation behind autosomal recessive congenital ichthyosis (ARCI), a rare and life-threatening inherited skin disorder that appears at birth.

Affecting approximately one in 100,000 people, ARCI causes lifelong complications including extremely dry and scaly skin, chronic inflammation and a high risk of infections. There is currently no cure or effective treatment, and patients must manage their symptoms for life.

“For many patients, this condition is not only physically painful, but also deeply stigmatizing and isolating,” said Dr. Hedtrich.

By testing the treatment in models made from living human skin, the team showed it can restore up to 30 per cent of normal skin function—a level that previous research suggests could be clinically meaningful for returning skin function to normal.

While ARCI affects relatively few people, the researchers say the treatment strategy could be adapted to many other genetic skin diseases, including epidermolysis bullosa—a severe skin blistering condition often called ‘butterfly skin’—and potentially more common conditions such as eczema or psoriasis.

“The approach we developed is a platform technology,” said Dr. Hedtrich. “It can be readily adapted to treat almost any skin disease.”

A new way to deliver CRISPR gene editing 

Despite major advances in gene editing, applying the technology to skin diseases has remained a long-standing challenge. The skin’s primary role is to protect the body from the outside world, making it difficult to deliver large biological therapies, such as gene editors, past its protective barrier.

To overcome this, the team developed a novel delivery method that uses lipid nanoparticle technology, or LNPs. These microscopic “bubbles of fat,” pioneered by UBC professor Dr. Pieter Cullis [emphasis mine] and brought to global prominence through mRNA vaccines, are able to carry gene-editing technology into cells.

Using a clinically approved laser, the researchers first create microscopic, pain-free openings in the outer layers of the skin. This allows the lipid nanoparticles to pass through the skin barrier and reach skin stem cells beneath the surface. Once inside, the gene editor corrects the underlying DNA mutation, enabling the skin to begin functioning more normally.

“This is a highly targeted, localized approach,” said Dr. Hedtrich. “The treatment stays in the skin and we saw no evidence of off-target effects, which is a critical safety milestone.”

The study was conducted in close collaboration with Vancouver-based biotech company NanoVation Therapeutics [emphasis mine], a UBC spin-off focused on developing LNP-based genetic medicines. The researchers now hope to bring the treatment into clinical testing and have already been working with regulatory authorities to define the necessary safety and efficacy studies. [emphasis mine]

“Our goal now is to take this from the lab into first-in-human clinical trials,” said Dr. Hedtrich. “We hope this work will ultimately lead to a safe, effective treatment that can transform the lives of patients who currently have no real therapeutic options.”

Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,

Lipid nanoparticle-based non-viral in situ gene editing of congenital ichthyosis-causing mutations in human skin models by Dilem Ceren Apaydin, Gaurav Sadhnani, Tiffany Carlaw, Jan Renziehausen, Elena Lizunova, Viviane Filor, Anna Hiller, Sophia Brumhard, Vincent Halim, Ulrike Brüning, Johannes Bischof, Rafaela Horbach Marodin, Daniel Z. Kurek, Manuel Rhiel, Sandra Ammann, Tatjana I. Cornu, Toni Cathomen, Leif Erik Sander, Benedikt Obermayer, Fabian Coscia, Jennifer Kirwan, Ulrich Koller, Achim D. Gruber, Wolfgang Bäumer, and Sarah Hedtrich. Cell Stem Cell Available online 27 January 2026 In Press, Corrected Proof DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2026.01.001

This paper is behind a paywall.

NanoVation Therapeutics, the UBC spin-off mentioned in the news release, was co-founded by Pieter Cullis according to the company’s Our Team webpage.

Ready to start eating gene-edited pork?

Ready or not, it’s coming to our grocery stores. Last year’s September 19, 2025 posting “Gene-edited pork coming to Canadian consumers—soon (maybe)” now has its companion piece. A January 23, 2026 Health Canada news release announces approval,

Canada approves pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses for use in food and feed

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV) are one of the most devastating classes of viruses affecting farmed pigs, representing significant losses for Canada’s producers and higher prices at the store for Canadian consumers.

Today, Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) announced the completion of independent, comprehensive safety assessments on pigs resistant to PRRSV following applications from Genus PLC [sic] and PIC [Pig Improvement Company] Canada, Ltd., respectively. Health Canada has concluded that foods made from these pigs are as safe and nutritious for people to eat as pork currently available in Canada. The CFIA has confirmed that these pigs are also safe and effective for use in livestock feeds.

Improving resistance to PRRSV in pigs will help farmers avoid illness in their herds from these viruses, reduce antibiotic use, and improve animal welfare, while supporting a more stable, affordable and sustainable food supply.

Genus PLC’s PRRSV-resistant pigs are already permitted for food use in the U.S., Brazil, Colombia and the Dominican Republic. Genus PLC has indicated that even though Canada has approved the sale of PRRSV resistant pigs, the company does not intend to sell these pigs before further regulatory authorization in other key markets. The company and Health Canada are committed to the highest level of transparency and will communicate to the public when this new technology enters the Canadian market.

While genetically engineered foods are considered as safe and nutritious as conventional foods, the Government of Canada recognizes that information about genetic engineering is important. That is why we have been working with the Canadian General Standards Board since November [2025?] on a public review of the National Standard for labelling and advertising of foods that are, and are not, products of genetic engineering. The CFIA uses this Standard to provide its guidance to companies on the labelling of foods.

Quick facts

  • In 2024, the swine industry generated over $6.3 billion in farm cash receipts and Canada produced 2.34 million tonnes of pork and exported 1.45 million tonnes of pork.
  • As of January 1, 2025, there were 13.9M hogs on 6,885 Canadian farms.
  • PRRSV infections can cause severe symptoms in pigs like breathing problems, fever, the inability to eat, and can lead to stillborn piglets and death.
  • There are currently no effective treatments, and vaccination has only been partially effective.
  • In Canada, food labelling is required when there are well-established health risks or significant changes to the nutritional qualities of the food. For example, an allergen in a food must be labelled to alert consumers of the risk.
  • Because Health Canada found no health and safety concerns, no special labelling is required for foods from these PRRSV-resistant pigs.
  • In addition to the assessments noted above, in December 2025, the New Substances program—jointly administered by Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada—determined that environmental and human health risks from indirect exposure to these pigs is no different from pigs currently available in Canada.

Amina Zafar’s January 23, 2026 article of Canadian Broadcasting News (CBC) news online offers, in addition to information from the news release, detail about a previous attempt to introduce genetically modified food to Canadians, Note: Links have been removed,

Food made from pigs engineered to be resistant to a porcine virus are as safe and nutritious to eat as pork currently on the market, Health Canada said Friday.

Federal regulators announced pigs resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (PRRSV) — which it called a devastating class of viruses in farmed pigs — are safe to use in food and livestock feeds.

More than 25 years ago, scientists at Memorial University in Newfoundland developed a salmon that would become the first transgenic food animal approved for sale in Canada. Sold as AquAdvantage Salmon, the DNA came from Pacific salmon and the eel-like ocean pout.

At the time, the Council of Canadians said it was concerned about the amount of water extracted, effluent and transport of eggs between facilities.

Unlike the genetically modified salmon, the PRRSV-resistant pigs were created using CRISPR gene-editing technology that makes precise genetic changes without introducing genetic material from another species, scientists say. 

“This is the first gene-edited animal that has been approved for commercial sale in Canada,” said Gwendolyn Blue, a professor in the geography department at the University of Calgary who studies the politics and values surrounding gene editing.

While Blue recognizes the advantages PRRSV-resistant pigs could bring, she’s also notes there are ethical, moral, cultural and political questions surrounding the approval, such as how assessments about safety were made, as well as Canada’s updated biotechnology regulations.

“One of the concerns that people have had within a Canadian context is labeling,” she said. “There is no mandatory labeling and this is something that is currently under review.”

While there is a Winnipeg-based PIC (Pig Improvement Company) branch, the North American offshoot of the company (UK’s Genus plc) is headquartered in the US state of Tennessee. I quite appreciate the detail offered in the PIC January 23, 2026 news release,

Today Health Canada and the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) approved PIC’s PRRS-resistant pigs for sale as food in Canada after rigorous and thorough review. Additionally, Environment & Climate Change Canada (ECCC) conducted its own review of the research and data and concluded that PRRS-resistant pigs may now be manufactured [?] or imported in Canada.

“We have spent years conducting extensive research, validating our findings and working with the Canadian government to gain approval,” said Matt Culbertson, PIC’s Chief Operating Officer. “Today marks a major milestone for consumers, farmers, and the entire pork industry who have hoped for relief from PRRS for decades.”

Review of Research and Data Confirms Safety

Health Canada and CFIA conducted scientific assessments that ensured the pigs are safe for consumption and do not differ from other pigs available on the market. Their evaluation led them to conclude that aside from the precise deletion of a small part of a gene involved in PRRS infection, the PRRS-resistant pigs are no different than other pigs.

Health Canada and CFIA further concluded that there are no differences in the nutritional value of the pork from PRRS-resistant pigs compared to other pork available for consumption.

How Removing Animal Disease Can Improve Animal Welfare

Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is one of the most devastating, global swine diseases. It causes needless suffering and premature death for pigs, negatively impacts animal welfare, exacerbates the need for antibiotics and increases the environmental impact of raising pigs.

“Addressing PRRS can allow us to improve animal welfare, reduce the need for antibiotics and decrease the environmental impact of raising pigs,” said Todd Wilken, PIC Director of North America Sales. “In fact, recent research indicates that PRRS increases the need for antibiotics by more than 2 times compared to pigs without PRRS.1

PIC Has Earned Regulatory Clearance in a Number of Countries

Canada joins a growing list of countries that have deemed the gene edit safe and effective. The U.S. FDA approved the gene edit in April 2025, while Colombia, Brazil, Dominican Republic and Argentina have issued positive determinations for PRRS-resistant pigs, meaning those countries have recognized that the pigs are not GMO and should be treated the same as any other pigs.

“We are committed to the responsible and intentional introduction of the PRRS-resistant pig around the globe. Gaining approval in Canada is an important step in this process, and we are working with additional countries to gain regulatory approval and protect global trade prior to initiating sales and delivery,” said Culbertson.

PIC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Genus, a UK-based company, publicly traded on the London Stock Exchange.

Canadian consumers indicate above average purchase likelihood for pork from gene-edited pigs

Research conducted by Circana [US market research company] and commissioned by PIC in late 2025 found that there is an above average likelihood that Canadian consumers will purchase pork from gene-edited pigs.

The research polled more than 5,000 pork consumers from eight key countries, representative across genders and ages 18 to 70.

Circana found that 90% of Canadian consumers are open to purchasing pork from gene-edited pigs and that responsibly reducing the need for antibiotics ranked as the top motivator.

Visit PRRSResistantPig.com for more information.

About PIC  

PIC (Pig Improvement Company) is the global leader in swine genetics. PIC provides genetically superior breeding stock to pig producers and supports them with technical services to help them realize genetic potential. PIC is a subsidiary of Genus, a UK-based company with a vision to pioneer animal genetic improvement to help nourish the world. www.pic.com

About Genus

Genus is a world-leading animal genetics company, supplying high-quality breeding animals with desirable characteristics to farmers, and enabling them to produce better quality meat and milk more efficiently to feed the world more sustainably. PIC is the porcine division within Genus. www.genusplc.com

Sources:

  1. Isadora Machado, Thomas Petznick, Ana Paula S. Poeta Silva, Chong Wang, Locke Karriker, Daniel C.L. Linhares, Gustavo S. Silva. “Assessment of changes in antibiotic use in grow-finish pigs after the introduction of PRRSV in a naïve farrow-to-finish system.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106350

A bit disturbing, the change in terminology, that is. Since when do farmers manufacture pigs? Don’t they breed and/or grow pigs?

As for Canadians, this gene-edited pork will not be labelled under the current rules. Although that could change it may take a while as the government of Canada’s “Canadian General Standards Board conducts, since November [2025?], a public review of the National Standard for labelling and advertising of foods that are, and are not, products of genetic engineering.”

Congratulations to winners of 2020 Nobel Prize for Chemistry: Dr. Emmanuelle Charpentier & Dr. Jennifer A. Doudna (CRISPR-cas9)

It’s possible there’s a more dramatic development in the field of contemporary gene-editing but it’s indisputable that CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) -cas9 (CRISPR-associated 9 [protein]) ranks very highly indeed.

The technique, first discovered (or developed) in 2012, has brought recognition in the form of the 2020 Nobel Prize for Chemistry to CRISPR’s two discoverers, Emanuelle Charpentier and Jennifer Doudna.

An October 7, 2020 news item on phys.org announces the news,

The Nobel Prize in chemistry went to two researchers Wednesday [October 7, 2020] for a gene-editing tool that has revolutionized science by providing a way to alter DNA, the code of life—technology already being used to try to cure a host of diseases and raise better crops and livestock.

Emmanuelle Charpentier of France and Jennifer A. Doudna of the United States won for developing CRISPR-cas9, a very simple technique for cutting a gene at a specific spot, allowing scientists to operate on flaws that are the root cause of many diseases.

“There is enormous power in this genetic tool,” said Claes Gustafsson, chair of the Nobel Committee for Chemistry.

More than 100 clinical trials are underway to study using CRISPR to treat diseases, and “many are very promising,” according to Victor Dzau, president of the [US] National Academy of Medicine.

“My greatest hope is that it’s used for good, to uncover new mysteries in biology and to benefit humankind,” said Doudna, who is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley, and is paid by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, which also supports The Associated Press’ Health and Science Department.

The prize-winning work has opened the door to some thorny ethical issues: When editing is done after birth, the alterations are confined to that person. Scientists fear CRISPR will be misused to make “designer babies” by altering eggs, embryos or sperm—changes that can be passed on to future generations.

Unusually for phys.org, this October 7, 2020 news item is not a simple press/news release reproduced in its entirety but a good overview of the researchers’ accomplishments and a discussion of some of the issues associated with CRISPR along with the press release at the end.

I have covered some CRISPR issues here including intellectual property (see my March 15, 2017 posting titled, “CRISPR patent decision: Harvard’s and MIT’s Broad Institute victorious—for now‘) and designer babies (as exemplified by the situation with Dr. He Jiankui; see my July 28, 2020 post titled, “July 2020 update on Dr. He Jiankui (the CRISPR twins) situation” for more details about it).

An October 7, 2020 article by Michael Grothaus for Fast Company provides a business perspective (Note: A link has been removed),

Needless to say, research by the two scientists awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry today has the potential to change the course of humanity. And with that potential comes lots of VC money and companies vying for patents on techniques and therapies derived from Charpentier’s and Doudna’s research.

One such company is Doudna’s Editas Medicine [according to my search, the only company associated with Doudna is Mammoth Biosciences, which she co-founded], while others include Caribou Biosciences, Intellia Therapeutics, and Casebia Therapeutics. Given the world-changing applications—and the amount of revenue such CRISPR therapies could bring in—it’s no wonder that such rivalry is often heated (and in some cases has led to lawsuits over the technology and its patents).

As Doudna explained in her book, A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution, cowritten by Samuel H. Sternberg …, “… —but we could also have woolly mammoths, winged lizards, and unicorns.” And as for that last part, she made clear, “No, I am not kidding.”

Everybody makes mistakes and the reference to Editas Medicine is the only error I spotted. You can find out more about Mammoth Biosciences here and while Dr. Doudna’s comment, “My greatest hope is that it’s used for good, to uncover new mysteries in biology and to benefit humankind,” is laudable it would seem she wishes to profit from the discovery. Mammoth Biosciences is a for-profit company as can be seen at the end of the Mammoth Biosciences’ October 7, 2020 congratulatory news release,

About Mammoth Biosciences

Mammoth Biosciences is harnessing the diversity of nature to power the next-generation of CRISPR products. Through the discovery and development of novel CRISPR systems, the company is enabling the full potential of its platform to read and write the code of life. By leveraging its internal research and development and exclusive licensing to patents related to Cas12, Cas13, Cas14 and Casɸ, Mammoth Biosciences can provide enhanced diagnostics and genome editing for life science research, healthcare, agriculture, biodefense and more. Based in San Francisco, Mammoth Biosciences is co-founded by CRISPR pioneer Jennifer Doudna and Trevor Martin, Janice Chen, and Lucas Harrington. The firm is backed by top institutional investors [emphasis mine] including Decheng, Mayfield, NFX, and 8VC, and leading individual investors including Brook Byers, Tim Cook, and Jeff Huber.

An October 7, 2029 Nobel Prize press release, which unleashed all this interest in Doudna and Charpentier, notes this,

Prize amount: 10 million Swedish kronor, to be shared equally between the Laureates.

In Canadian money that amount is $1,492,115.03 (as of Oct. 9, 2020 12:40 PDT when I checked a currency converter).

Ordinarily there’d be a mildly caustic comment from me about business opportunities and medical research but this is a time for congratulations to both Dr. Emanuelle Charpentier and Dr. Jennifer Doudna.