A September 17, 2025 news item from ScienceDaily announced research from Harvard University focused on more sustainable ways to recycle protein by breaking down keratin,
Key Takeaways
SEAS [School of Engineering and Applied Sciences] researchers have discovered the chemical mechanism by which certain salt compounds break down protein waste, like wool and feathers.
The discovery enables a gentler and more sustainable protein recycling process.
The textile and meat-processing industries produce billions of tons of waste annually in the form of feathers, wool and hair, all of which are rich in keratin – the strong, fibrous protein found in hair, skin and nails.
Turning all that animal waste into useful products – from wound dressings to eco-friendly textiles to health extracts – would be a boon for the environment and for new, sustainable industries. But upcycling proteins is challenging: Breaking down, or de-naturing, proteins into their component parts typically requires corrosive chemicals in large, polluting facilities, keeping any cost-effective protocol out of reach.
Researchers in the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) have uncovered key fundamental chemistry of how proteins like keratin de-nature in the presence of certain salt compounds – an insight that could take protein recycling to the next level.
…
Caption: An artist’s depiction of hair, made out of keratin, denaturing when ions are present. Credit: Michael Rosnach
A team led by Kit Parker, the Tarr Family Professor of Bioengineering and Applied Physics at SEAS, combined experiments and molecular simulations to better illuminate the chemical mechanisms by which salts cause proteins to unfold. They’ve shown that a solution of concentrated, a salt compound known to break apart keratin, interacts with the protein molecules in a completely unexpected way – not by binding to the proteins directly, as was conventional wisdom, but by changing the structure of the surrounding water molecules to create a setting more favorable for spontaneous protein unfolding.
This insight allowed the researchers to design a gentler, more sustainable keratin extraction process, separating the protein out of solution easily and without the need for harsh chemicals. The process can also be reversed with the same salt mixture, enabling recovery and reuse of lithium bromide denaturants.
The research is published in Nature Communicationsand is also featured in a Behind the Paper blog post.
Inspired by keratin biomaterials
First author Yichong Wang, a graduate student in chemistry who works in Parker’s group, said the research builds on the lab’s longstanding interest in developing keratin biomaterials with shape memory for biomedical applications. They had previously observed that keratin extracted from lithium bromide solvents can form thick, shapeable gels that readily separate from the surrounding solution and solidify almost immediately when placed back in water. While useful, they found the behavior odd, and they wanted to understand it better.
“We thought there might be a gap between current mechanistic understanding of how de-naturation works, and what we were seeing,” Wang said. “That’s when we got very interested in the mechanism itself to see if we could optimize our extraction procedures by explaining this phenomenon better.”
Molecular dynamics reveals shifts in surrounding water
To dig deeper, the team turned to the lab of Professor Eugene Shakhnovich in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, whose expertise is in protein biophysics. Molecular dynamics simulations led by co-author Junlang Liu allowed them to see that the lithium bromides were not working on the proteins at all, but rather, on the water around them.
It turns out lithium bromide ions cause water molecules to shift into two different populations – normal water, and water molecules that become trapped by the salt ions. As the normal water volume decreases, the proteins start to unfold due to the thermodynamic shift in the environment, rather than being directly ripped apart like in other de-naturation methods. “Making the water less like water, allows the protein to unfold itself,” Wang said. They had similar results by testing simpler proteins like fibronectin, pointing to a universal mechanism.
Better understanding and designing protein extraction methods that are less energy-intensive and less polluting than conventional ones opens potential avenues for protein-upcycling industries. In the Parker lab, using keratin as a substrate for tissue engineering is a major research thrust; having a reliable, sustainable method to extract and re-use such products would bolster their efforts.
What’s more, the process could lay a path for a whole new biomaterials industry, turning a massive waste stream like hair or chicken feathers into low-cost recycled materials, possibly as an alternative for traditional plastics, for example.
The research had many sources of federal support, including the National Institutes of Health (R35GM139571 and R01EY030444) and the National Science Foundation through the Harvard University Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (DMR-2011764). Other funding came from the Health@InnoHK program of the Innovation and Technology Commission, part of the Hong Kong SAR Government; and the Medical and Health Informatics Laboratories at NTT Research, Inc.
Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,
Entropy-driven denaturation enables sustainable protein regeneration through rapid gel-solid transition by Yichong Wang, Junlang Liu, Michael M. Peters, Ryoma Ishii, Dianzhuo Wang, Sourav Chowdhury, Kevin Kit Parker & Eugene I. Shakhnovich. Nature Communications volume 16, Article number: 6907 (2025) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61959-9 Published online: 26 July 2025 Version of record: 26 July 2025
This paper is open access.
There’s also an August 1, 2025 posting by Yichong Wang and Kit Parker (two of the paper’s authors) on SpringerNature’s Behind the Paper blog,
From Hofmeister’s Curiosity to an Interesting Mechanism
In 1888, Franz Hofmeister published a curious observation: salts affect protein solubility in water in systematic ways. This led to the famous “Hofmeister Series,” a ranking of ions based on their ability to precipitate or solubilize proteins. Over the next century, many studies expanded on these observations of salt-induced effects on protein folding, but a unifying theory explaining how ions influence protein structure remained elusive.
Our recent study originated from a practical challenge rather than a theoretical hypothesis. In our lab’s ongoing work to study the shape memory effect of regenerated keratin — a structural protein abundant in wool, hair, and feathers — we observed some puzzling behaviors. When keratin is extracted using concentrated lithium bromide (LiBr), it does not form a fully solubilized protein solution. Instead, we observed that the proteins spontaneously aggregate into a thick, cohesive gel that can be readily separated from the surrounding solution. More unexpectedly, this protein gel solidifies almost immediately upon rehydration, without the need for dialysis or removal of the denaturants. These phenomenon contrasted sharply with the behavior observed when using organic denaturants such as urea or guanidine hydrochloride.
Illustration by Michael Rosnach (Disease Biophysics Group, Harvard University)
None of these phenomenon matched existing explanations for how LiBr supposedly works. If LiBr denatures proteins by directly binding to them, why would the keratin spontaneously separate out of solution? Why would it renature so quickly just by being placed back in water? …
The Rotary Jet-Spinning manufacturing system was developed specifically as a therapeutic for the wounds of war. The dressings could be a good option for large wounds, such as burns, as well as smaller wounds on the face and hands, where preventing scarring is important. Illustration courtesy of Michael Rosnach/Harvard University
This image really gets the idea of regeneration across to the viewer while also informing you that this is medicine that comes from the military. A March 19,2018 news item on phys.org announces the work,
Researchers from the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering have developed new wound dressings that dramatically accelerate healing and improve tissue regeneration. The two different types of nanofiber dressings, described in separate papers, use naturally-occurring proteins in plants and animals to promote healing and regrow tissue.
Our fiber manufacturing system was developed specifically for the purpose of developing therapeutics for the wounds of war,” said Kit Parker, the Tarr Family Professor of Bioengineering and Applied Physics at SEAS and senior author of the research. “As a soldier in Afghanistan, I witnessed horrible wounds and, at times, the healing process for those wounds was a horror unto itself. This research is a years-long effort by many people on my team to help with these problems.”
Parker is also a Core Faculty Member of the Wyss Institute.
The most recent paper, published in Biomaterials, describes a wound dressing inspired by fetal tissue.
In the late 1970s, when scientists first started studying the wound-healing process early in development, they discovered something unexpected: Wounds incurred before the third trimester left no scars. This opened a range of possibilities for regenerative medicine. But for decades, researchers have struggled to replicate those unique properties of fetal skin.
Unlike adult skin, fetal skin has high levels of a protein called fibronectin, which assembles into the extracellular matrix and promotes cell binding and adhesion. Fibronectin has two structures: globular, which is found in blood, and fibrous, which is found in tissue. Even though fibrous fibronectin holds the most promise for wound healing, previous research focused on the globular structure, in part because manufacturing fibrous fibronectin was a major engineering challenge.
But Parker and his team are pioneers in the field of nanofiber engineering.
The researchers made fibrous fibronectin using a fiber-manufacturing platform called Rotary Jet-Spinning (RJS), developed by Parker’s Disease Biophysics Group. RJS works likes a cotton-candy machine — a liquid polymer solution, in this case globular fibronectin dissolved in a solvent, is loaded into a reservoir and pushed out through a tiny opening by centrifugal force as the device spins. As the solution leaves the reservoir, the solvent evaporates and the polymers solidify. The centrifugal force unfolds the globular protein into small, thin fibers. These fibers — less than one micrometer in diameter — can be collected to form a large-scale wound dressing or bandage.
“The dressing integrates into the wound and acts like an instructive scaffold, recruiting different stem cells that are relevant for regeneration and assisting in the healing process before being absorbed into the body,” said Christophe Chantre, a graduate student in the Disease Biophysics Group and first author of the paper.
In in vivo testing, the researchers found that wounds treated with the fibronectin dressing showed 84 percent tissue restoration within 20 days, compared with 55.6 percent restoration in wounds treated with a standard dressing.
The researchers also demonstrated that wounds treated with the fibronectin dressing had almost normal epidermal thickness and dermal architecture, and even regrew hair follicles — often considered one of the biggest challenges in the field of wound healing.
“This is an important step forward,” said Chantre. “Most work done on skin regeneration to date involves complex treatments combining scaffolds, cells, and even growth factors. Here we were able to demonstrate tissue repair and hair follicle regeneration using an entirely material approach. This has clear advantages for clinical translation.”
In another paper published in Advanced Healthcare Materials, the Disease Biophysics Group demonstrated a soy-based nanofiber that also enhances and promotes wound healing.
Soy protein contains both estrogen-like molecules — which have been shown to accelerate wound healing — and bioactive molecules similar to those that build and support human cells.
“Both the soy- and fibronectin-fiber technologies owe their success to keen observations in reproductive medicine,” said Parker. “During a woman’s cycle, when her estrogen levels go high, a cut will heal faster. If you do a surgery on a baby still in the womb, they have scar-less wound healing. Both of these new technologies are rooted in the most fascinating of all the topics in human biology — how we reproduce.”
In a similar way to fibronectin fibers, the research team used RJS to spin ultrathin soy fibers into wound dressings. In experiments, the soy- and cellulose-based dressing demonstrated a 72 percent increase in healing over wounds with no dressing and a 21 percent increase in healing over wounds dressed without soy protein.
“These findings show the great promise of soy-based nanofibers for wound healing,” said Seungkuk Ahn, a graduate student in the Disease Biophysics Group and first author of the paper. “These one-step, cost-effective scaffolds could be the next generation of regenerative dressings and push the envelope of nanofiber technology and the wound-care market.”
Both kinds of dressing, according to researchers, have advantages in the wound-healing space. The soy-based nanofibers — consisting of cellulose acetate and soy protein hydrolysate — are inexpensive, making them a good option for large-scale use, such as on burns. The fibronectin dressings, on the other hand, could be used for smaller wounds on the face and hands, where preventing scarring is important.
Here’s are links and citations for both papers mentioned in the news release,
Production-scale fibronectin nanofibers promote wound closure and tissue repair in a dermal mouse model by Christophe O. Chantre, Patrick H. Campbell, Holly M. Golecki, Adrian T. Buganza, Andrew K. Capulli, Leila F. Deravi, Stephanie Dauth, Sean P. Sheehy, Jeffrey A.Paten. KarlGledhill, Yanne S. Doucet, Hasan E.Abaci, Seungkuk Ahn, Benjamin D.Pope, Jeffrey W.Ruberti, Simon P.Hoerstrup, Angela M.Christiano, Kevin Kit Parker. Biomaterials Volume 166, June 2018, Pages 96-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.03.006 Available online 5 March 2018
Both papers are behind paywalls although you may want to check with ResearchGate where many researchers make their papers available for free.
One last comment, I noticed this at the end of Burrows’ news release,
The Harvard Office of Technology Development has protected the intellectual property relating to these projects and is exploring commercialization opportunities.
It reminded me of the patent battle between the Broad Institute (a Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology joint venture) and the University of California at Berkeley over CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) technology. (My March 15, 2017 posting describes the battle’s outcome.)
Lest we forget, there could be major financial rewards from this work.
A portable nanofiber fabrication device is quite an achievement although it seems it’s not quite ready for prime time yet. From a March 1, 2017 news item on Nanowerk (Note: A link has been removed),
Harvard researchers have developed a lightweight, portable nanofiber fabrication device that could one day be used to dress wounds on a battlefield or dress shoppers in customizable fabrics. The research was published recently in Macromolecular Materials and Engineering (“Design and Fabrication of Fibrous Nanomaterials Using Pull Spinning”)
A schematic of the pull spinning apparatus with a side view illustration of a fiber being pulled from the polymer reservoir. The pull spinning system consists of a rotating bristle that dips and pulls a polymer jet in a spiral trajectory (Leila Deravi/Harvard University)
A March 1, 2017 Harvard University news release (also on EurekAlert) by Leah Burrow,, which originated the news item, describes the current process for nanofiber fabrication and explains how this technique is an improvement,
There are many ways to make nanofibers. These versatile materials — whose target applications include everything from tissue engineering to bullet proof vests — have been made using centrifugal force, capillary force, electric field, stretching, blowing, melting, and evaporation.
Each of these fabrication methods has pros and cons. For example, Rotary Jet-Spinning (RJS) and Immersion Rotary Jet-Spinning (iRJS) are novel manufacturing techniques developed in the Disease Biophysics Group at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering. Both RJS and iRJS dissolve polymers and proteins in a liquid solution and use centrifugal force or precipitation to elongate and solidify polymer jets into nanoscale fibers. These methods are great for producing large amounts of a range of materials – including DNA, nylon, and even Kevlar – but until now they haven’t been particularly portable.
The Disease Biophysics Group recently announced the development of a hand-held device that can quickly produce nanofibers with precise control over fiber orientation. Regulating fiber alignment and deposition is crucial when building nanofiber scaffolds that mimic highly aligned tissue in the body or designing point-of-use garments that fit a specific shape.
“Our main goal for this research was to make a portable machine that you could use to achieve controllable deposition of nanofibers,” said Nina Sinatra, a graduate student in the Disease Biophysics Group and co-first author of the paper. “In order to develop this kind of point-and-shoot device, we needed a technique that could produce highly aligned fibers with a reasonably high throughput.”
The new fabrication method, called pull spinning, uses a high-speed rotating bristle that dips into a polymer or protein reservoir and pulls a droplet from solution into a jet. The fiber travels in a spiral trajectory and solidifies before detaching from the bristle and moving toward a collector. Unlike other processes, which involve multiple manufacturing variables, pull spinning requires only one processing parameter — solution viscosity — to regulate nanofiber diameter. Minimal process parameters translate to ease of use and flexibility at the bench and, one day, in the field.
Pull spinning works with a range of different polymers and proteins. The researchers demonstrated proof-of-concept applications using polycaprolactone and gelatin fibers to direct muscle tissue growth and function on bioscaffolds, and nylon and polyurethane fibers for point-of-wear apparel.
“This simple, proof-of-concept study demonstrates the utility of this system for point-of-use manufacturing,” said Kit Parker, the Tarr Family Professor of Bioengineering and Applied Physics and director of the Disease Biophysics Group. “Future applications for directed production of customizable nanotextiles could extend to spray-on sportswear that gradually heats or cools an athlete’s body, sterile bandages deposited directly onto a wound, and fabrics with locally varying mechanical properties.”
Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,
Design and Fabrication of Fibrous Nanomaterials Using Pull Spinning by Leila F. Deravi, Nina R. Sinatra, Christophe O. Chantre, Alexander P. Nesmith, Hongyan Yuan, Sahm K. Deravi, Josue A. Goss, Luke A. MacQueen, Mohammad R. Badrossamy, Grant M. Gonzalez, Michael D. Phillips, and Kevin Kit Parker. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering DOI: 10.1002/mame.201600404 Version of Record online: 17 JAN 2017
