Tag Archives: University of Winnipeg

Latest Canadian students’ math and reading scores drop, the 2022 PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment]) scorecard

It took a while (until December 2023) for the OECD’s (Organization for Economic Cooperation Development) to release its latest (2022) PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) scores.

Where Canada is concerned the scores seem to be a case of ‘the same old same old as per my October 9, 2013 posting about Canada’s then latest PISA scores, “What happened? 2009 report says Canadian students are leaders in reading, math, and science; 2013 report says Canadian students are dropping out of maths and sciences.”

Onto the 2022 results: you can find the OECD’s November 5, 2023 press release, “Decline in educational performance only partly attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic,” announcing the latest PISA result and there’s this December 5, 2023 CBC (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation) online news item, which contrasts the 2022 results with the 2018 results, Note: A link has been removed,

Math and reading scores of Canadian students continue to decline steeply, matching a global trend, according to a new study.

The state of global education was given a bleak appraisal in the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), which is the first study to examine the academic progress of 15-year-old students in dozens of countries during the pandemic.

Released Tuesday [December 5, 2023], it finds the average international math score fell by the equivalent of 15 points compared to 2018 scores, while reading scores fell 10 points.

The study found Canada’s overall math scores declined 15 points between 2018 and 2022. According to PISA, which defines a drop of 20 points as losing out on a fully year of learning, that means Canada’s math score dropped by an equivalent of three-quarters of a year of learning.

During that same time period, reading scores of Canadian students dropped by 13 points and science by three.

Only 12 per cent of Canadian students were high math achievers, scoring at Level 5 or 6. That’s fewer than some of the top Asian countries and economies: In Singapore, 41 per cent of students performed at the top level; in Hong Kong, 27 per cent; and in Japan and Korea, 23 per cent.

Louis Volante, a professor of education governance at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ont., believes the pandemic had more of a negative effect on math learning than reading and science.

‘Some provinces declining more than others’

Anna Stokke, a math professor at the University of Winnipeg, notes that math scores in Canada have been trending in the wrong direction since 2003, “with some provinces declining more than others.”

According to the study, the provinces with the largest drop in math scores since 2018 were Newfoundland Labrador with 29, Nova Scotia with 24, New Brunswick with 23 and Manitoba with 22. Meanwhile, Alberta’s score only dropped by seven and B.C.’s just eight.

“I do think part of the problem is the philosophy of how to teach math,” Stokke told CBC News.

“First of all, we’re not spending enough time on math in schools. And second of all, kids just aren’t getting good instruction in a lot of cases. They’re not getting explicit instruction. They’re not getting enough practice. And that really needs to change.”

A survey of students found about half faced closures of more than three months, but it didn’t always lead to lower scores. There was “no clear difference” in performance trends between countries that had limited closures, including Iceland and Sweden, and those with longer closures, including Brazil and Ireland, according to the report.

Canada still in top 10

Singapore, long seen as an education powerhouse, had the highest scores by far in every subject. It was joined in the upper echelons by other East Asian countries, including Japan and China.

Despite the declines across the subjects, Canada did well compared to the other countries in the report, placing ninth in math, sixth in reading and seventh in science.

Usually given every three years, the latest test was delayed a year because of the pandemic. It was administered in 2022 to a sample of 15-year-olds in 37 countries that are OECD members, plus 44 other partner countries. The test has been conducted since 2000.

In 2022, 81 countries participated, with 23,000 Canadian high school students writing the test.

If you don’t have time to read all of the December 5, 2023 CBC online news item, there’s Quinn Henderson’s succinct December 6, 2023 article for the Daily Hive,

Wendy Hughes (then PhD student) and Sarfaroz Niyozov (then associate professor) both associated with the University of Toronto, presented a critique of PISA in their June 4, 2019 essay on The Conversation,

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) — the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development’s (OECD) global standardized test of student achievement — is frequently used by commentators to compare and rank national or provincial education systems.

PISA, which has now spread into 80 countries as a best education practice, presents itself as a tool to help countries make their systems more inclusive leading to equitable outcomes. But PISA is far more ambiguous and controversial.

Many academics and educators critique PISA as an economic measurement, not an educational one. The media generally use PISA results to blame and shame school systems. And the way that some politicians, policy-makers and researchers have used PISA is more closely aligned to a political process than an educational one.

You can find the PISA 2022 results here.

Simon Fraser University (Vancouver, Canada) and its president’s (Andrew Petter) dream colloquium: women in technology

I’m a little late with this event news (sadly,. I only received the information yesterday, Sept. 20, 2017) but even with two event dates already past (happily, videos for the two events have been posted), there are still several “Women in Technology” events to attend or view live according to the Simon Fraser University (SFU) President’s Dream Colloquium: Women in Technology; Attaining, Retaining, and Promoting Diverse Talent’s webpage text by Wan Yee Lok,

Women in Technology: Attracting, Retaining and Promoting Diverse Talent is a seven-part public [emphasis mine] lecture series beginning on Sept. 13. Key experts from around the world will identify challenges to gender equity and discover solutions for improving recruitment, retention and leadership options for women.

Diversity and inclusion are critical to high-tech corporate success. Yet statistics reveal that less than 25 per cent of those working in the science, technology, engineering and math sectors (STEM) are women, and that they earn seven-and-a-half per cent less than men.

“There is a crucial need to achieve gender equality in the tech sector, especially at a time when it is growing faster than ever,” says colloquium organizer Lesley Shannon, an SFU engineering science professor. She holds the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Chair for Women in Science and Engineering for the B.C. and Yukon region.

“We hope the colloquium will help people engage in a multidisciplinary dialogue about the value of creating more space in technology for women and other under-represented groups.”

Six of the lectures are free, except for Cathy O’Neil’s lecture on Oct. 26.

The President’s Dream Colloquium schedule is as follows:

Sept. 13: SFU KEY presents: We the Data
Juliette Powell, founder, Turing AI and WeTheData.org, author of 33 Million People in the Room

Sept. 14: Diversity 101: The Case for Diversity in Technology
Maria Klawe, president, Harvey Mudd College

Sept. 21: Women in Media and Advertising
Shari Graydon, catalyst, Informed Opinions

Oct. 12: Social Psychological Phenomena
Steven Spencer, the Robert K. and Dale J. Weary Chair in Social Psychology, Ohio State University

Oct. 26: Gender and Bias in Algorithmic Design
Cathy O’Neil, author, Weapons of Math Destruction [tickets are $5 for students; $15 for the rest of us; go here to buy tickets, click on green button in the upper right, below the banner; the event will be held at SFU’s Harbour Centre Vancouver location]

Nov 9: Gendered Language
Danielle Gaucher, associate professor, Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg

Nov. 23: Women as Leaders and Innovators
Jo Miller, founder, Be Leaderly

Lectures will be webcast live and available on the President’s Dream Colloquium website, www.sfu.ca/womenintech.

SFU engineering science professor Lesley Shannon is the colloquium organizer as well as the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Chair for Women in Science and Engineering for the B.C. and Yukon region.

 

As a part of the colloquium, students can enroll in a graduate course covering a broad range of topics related to diversity in the technology sector. Shannon says the course will focus on women and their role in technology as well as issues that affect other under‐represented groups.

“I hope the course will establish a foundation for future managers, supervisors, sponsors, mentors and others wanting to pursue leadership roles to work towards creating a level playing field in technology and other industries,” says Shannon.

The colloquium course (SAR 897) is still accepting students. Visit go.sfu.ca to enroll.

A reminder after the last few paragraphs of the event text, you don’t actually have to be a student to attend the lectures although for anyone who doesn’t want to make the trek up the hill (SFU is located on a hill in Burnaby, BC) for the majority of the events, there is the livestream video. For those who can’t make the scheduled times, given that both the Sept. 13 and Sept. 14, 2017 event videos have been posted, they are being pretty quick about uploading the videos afterwards.

I have mentioned Cathy O’Neil here a couple of times, more substantively in a Feb. 28, 2017 posting about a major’ big data’ collaboration between the province of BC and the state of Washington (for Cathy O’Neil, scroll down to the subsection titled: Algorithms and big data) and briefly at the end in a May 24, 2017 posting that was chiefly concerned with bias in algorithms.

Bits and bobs about the Canadian science scene: ecology news from Manitoba; Canadian space news; scientists in residence in BC

In the last ten days, I’ve gotten news of three Canadian science blogs and a scientist in residence program in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Andy Park, Associate Professor of Forest Ecology at the University of Winnipeg (Manitoba), writes the ‘It’s the Ecology, Stupid!;  A grumpy professor tells you what he really thinks about environmental issues in Canada’ blog. From his About page,

As you’d quickly find out if you met me, I was not born in Canada.  I moved here from the UK in 1988, having previously taken refuge from Thatcher’s Britain in Saudi Arabia for several years.

Since that time, I have finished an undergraduate degree at Simon Fraser University, worked as a forestry consultant in northern British Columbia, acquired a PhD, lived in Vancouver, Toronto, Montreal, and of course, Winnipeg, and travelled extensively within Canada from Tadousak to the McKenzie Delta.

Allied to my academic qualifications, I believe that these experiences make me at least somewhat qualified to comment on Canadian environmental issues.

Here’s a sample from Park’s June 7, 2012 posting (Note: I have removed links.],

You would have to have been living under a rock over the last couple of weeks not to have heard of the federal government’s decision to withdraw funding for Canada’s world-renowned Experimental Lakes Area (ELA).  Research emerging from this network of 58 small lakes in northwest Ontario has helped to clean up Lake Erie (see Figure 1), saved municipalities millions of dollars on the design of sewage plants, and shed light on the ecological pathways by which acid rain harms lakes.

The imminent closure of the ELA has not gone unnoticed internationally, and threatens to add another twist to the death spiral of Canada’s environmental reputation.

Water experts from around the world have weighed in to condemn the closure, and a who’s who of leading aquatic experts have written an open letter to Steven Harper requesting that he reverse the closure.

(I mentioned the ELA in a May 3 2012 posting about a major three-year project (starting in 2012) to study silver nanoparticles and their impact in the ELA ecosystem.)

Welcome to Andy Park and his lively blog!

Chuck Black contacted me about his two blogs both focused on outer space. There’s ‘Commercial Space‘ which is subtitled,  Focused on Canadian money making activities high above the skies… From the About this Blog page,

Businesses operating space related ventures have been commercially viable since at least the 1960’s, when the first Early Bird satellite was successfully launched into geosynchronous orbit according to David M. Livingston in his paper, Space: The Final Financial Frontier.

And Canadian companies have always been leaders in this area, beginning with the launch of the Allouette and Anik satellites and moving forward from there.

 

In fact, it’s got to the point where former Cabinet Minister Jim Prentice went so far as to say that “Canada has more than 200 firms that are involved in space” employing thousands of skilled workers who know that “working in space or working in the space-based industries is just another career option.”

This blog will focus on those industries, the partnerships developed to maintain and grow them and the politics surrounding those partnerships.

And perhaps somewhere along the line, we’ll even get around to discussing the next big opportunity to make some money.

The June 9, 2012 posting features the cancellation of a long-running high school science contest (Note: I have removed links from the excerpt),

The University of Toronto Space Design Contest (UTSDC), will not be holding a competition in 2012 and seems unlikely to be revived anytime soon.

The contest was an independent, student run organization operating out of the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto and held annual competitions from 2004 until 2011 for high school students to solve challenging space-related science and technology problems.

But the contest website hasn’t been updated since last years results were posted in May 2011, the contact form for the website is “offline” and inquiries to the University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering (which links from the UTSDC for contest “donations“) have gone unanswered.

Black’s second blog is called Space Conference News, from the About this Blog page (Note: I have removed a link from the excerpt),

Approximately 14,000 government and private organizations are considered as part of the international space systems industry, according to the 2011 Space Report.

Theses organizations generated $276.52 Billion USD last year and employ over 300,000 people throughout the world

But this industry is notoriously lacking in collaboration or cohesion and is composed primarily of narrow silo’s of skills distributed widely across political boundaries which possess little interconnectedness.

This is a shame, since these organizations need to connect with each other (and to students who will eventually become their future employees) in order to fill in knowledge gaps, develop useful contacts and present current proposals or provisional scientific findings for peer review.

So pretty much everyone is going to eventually end up needing to attend one or more of the 1000+ yearly conferences that have grown up over the last 20 years to cater to the people and organizations involved in this industry.

Black’s May 13, 2012 posting provides a listing of space-related events in June 2012. As for Chuck Black himself, here’s a description from the Space Conference News About the Author page (Note: I have removed links from the excerpt),

I’m a writer, “sales rainmaker,” aerospace pundit and the Treasurer of the Canadian Space Commerce Association (CSCA).

My background is cold calling “C” level executives, networking to build industry specific expertise and developing options for the building of long-term profitable sales relationships in situations with multiple key decision makers.

I also have a background in conference organizing, sponsorship and management. If you’d like to see some of my recent events, check out the National Conferences and Bimonthly Meetings sections of the CSCA website.

I write the Space Conference News website (which tracks upcoming international space science and engineering conferences) and the Commercial Space Blog (which focuses on the Canadian space systems industry).

My last item is about the Scientist in Residence Program in British Columbia. From the About page,

Based in Vancouver, British Columbia, the Scientist in Residence Program excites, inspires and supports elementary school children and teachers to discover the world through hands-on science. Scientists collaborate with teachers throughout the school year and engage children in the process of science through six or more visits in classrooms and on field trips. Through these direct interactions, scientists are positive role models, teachers enhance their comfort and abilities to teach science, and students develop positive attitudes and have fun while they learn about diverse aspects of science. Children gain skills such as keen observation, critical thinking, and thoughtful communication. These are essential life skills as well as science skills.

Paige Axelrood, Ph.D., is the Founder and Managing Director of the Scientist in Residence Program. Catriona Gordon, M.Sc., is the Assistant Program Manager of the Scientist in Residence Program. They collaborate with Valerie Overgaard, Ph.D., Associate Superintendent of Learning Services, and others at the Vancouver Board of Education to deliver the Program to Vancouver schools. Since 2004, 114 teachers, 20 scientists in residence, and more than more than 2700 students in kindergarten through grade 7 have participated in the Program at 37 elementary schools in the Vancouver School District, plus one elementary school in the West Vancouver School District.

The scientists in residence have M.Sc. or Ph.D. degrees in fields including botany, plant pathology, environmental sciences, fish physiology, marine biology and deep sea ecology, cell biology and medical genetics, human biology, physics, and electrical engineering. The scientists are researchers, instructors, project managers, and consultants. Many of them have had some affiliation with the University of British Columbia.

Scientists and teachers, together or separately, can apply to participate in the program. You can find forms and additional information here.