Tag Archives: archaeoacoustics

“When Buildings Speak” a February 22, 2026 talk hosted by the Dante Alighieri Society of BC in Vancouver (Canada)

The Dante Alighieri Society of BC (British Coumbia) in Vancouver January 2026 newsletter highlights an upcoming talk on architecture, Note: Although it’s not obvious in the society’s description for the talk, sound plays a part in Robinson’s approach to architecture,

When Buildings Speak. How Architecture Shapes the Way We Live, Feel, and Connect

A talk by Dr. Sarah Robinson ([Italy-based] architect)

Join architect and author Sarah Robinson for a compelling exploration of how the built world affects our wellbeing and our connections to one another. Inspired by her new book, The Architecture of Resonance (Routledge), Robinson reveals how architecture “acts”—guiding our movements, moods, and interactions in ways we often overlook. From the physics of resonance to the poetry of everyday life, she makes a powerful case for designing environments that support healthier, more meaningful and more sustainable ways of living.

Sunday, Feb 22, 2026

11.00 am-12.00 pm (PDT)

On Zoom – in English

3300-515 West Hastings St., Vancouver

More Info & RSVP

I found a bit more information on the event page, Note: Links have been removed,

FREE EVENT – Voluntary $10 Donation for Non-Members

Sarah Robinson is an architect, writer, educator and organic farmer whose practice is based in the Langhe region of Piemonte, Italy. She is an Adjunct Professor in the department of Architecture Design and Media Technology at Aalborg University, Denmark and teaches in the NAAD program at IUAV, Venice. She was the founding president of the Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture board of governors and co-edits the journal Intertwining. Her writing and interdisciplinary research is concerned with understanding the many ways the built environment interacts to shape body, mind and culture in a more-than-human world. Robinson is the author of The Architecture of Resonance: From Objects to Interactions (Routledege), a book that rethinks architecture as an active, lived process.

Getting to the ‘sound’ reason for my interest, from Robinson’s book abstract for The Architecture of Resonance; From Objects to Interactions,

The profound impact that design has on human experience—physically, emotionally, cognitively, or ecologically—is now well established. And while this experiential and affective turn in architecture is gaining momentum, studio time remains primarily dedicated to the creation of buildings as independent objects with minimal regard for the interactions and impacts those buildings may have on their inhabitants and their surroundings.

This book carefully details an alternative for thinking and designing that shifts attention from abstract formalism and object orientation to the creation of dynamic interacting fields of affective, tactile, kinaesthetic, ecological, and social engagement. The book articulates resonance as a model and metaphor for the way we interact with our environments. The word’s literal meaning is to re-sound, implying a surface or receptive body that amplifies and alters the sound [emphasis mine]—an interdependent relation and process occurring in between. Seven kinds of resonance specific to design are detailed theoretically and illustrated with practical and historical examples [emphasis mine]. These design strategies demonstrate the possibilities resulting from shifting attention and resources from the longstanding preoccupation with fixed forms towards structuring and supporting dynamic interactive relationships between the built and the natural and between people and place.

Fascinating. One last note: “You can pay for your donations and membership via email Interac at info@dantesocietybc.ca.”

15th-century Inca building constructed for sound

Carpa uasi. The carpa uasi was the bottom level of this building; it originally ended to the left of the arch (near the right side of the floor level). The 15th-century structure survived because the church built over and around it lent stability. Credit: Stella Nair Courtesy: University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)

This October 21, 2025 University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) news release by Sean Brenner tells a fascinating story about sound and architecture, Note: Links have been removed,

Key takeaways

  • UCLA art history professor Stella Nair is collaborating with an interdisciplinary team analyzing a unique Inca building that dates to the mid-15th century.
  • The building, in the remote town of Huaytará, Peru, appears to have been constructed specifically for the purpose of amplifying music and sound, with three walls and an opening at one end.
  • The study is important in part because scholars tend to focus on visual evidence when analyzing cultures of the past, but understanding the role of sound can create a more three-dimensional picture.

The Inca empire is renowned for its architecture; its buildings were intricately designed and extraordinarily durable.

But this summer, it was another aspect of Inca construction that captured the attention of Stella Nair, a UCLA associate professor of art history whose expertise is Indigenous arts and architecture of the Americas.

Nair spent three weeks in the remote town of Huaytará, Peru, studying a single Inca building that appears to have been created primarily to amplify sound and music. Known as a carpa uasi, the structure was likely built in the mid-15th century.

“We’re learning that sound was incredibly important from the earliest cities on, dating back several thousand years B.C.,” said Nair, who is working on her third book about Andean (in and around the Andes mountains) architecture. “Builders were incredibly sophisticated with their aural architecture, and the Incas are one part of this long, sophisticated tradition of sonic engineering.”

One of a kind

Nair said the structure is the only known carpa uasi in existence, and although scholars have known about it for many years, the building hasn’t been extensively researched — and no previous studies had identified its potential for amplifying sound.

One of its distinctive characteristics is that, because of its intended use, the carpa uasi was built with only three walls, with an opening at one of the gable ends. (The phrase carpa uasi means “tent house,” a reference to that open-ended structure.) Nair and her colleagues theorize that the design would have made it possible for sound — such as drums being used to announce the beginning or end of a battle — to be focused toward the building’s open end and then out to the surrounding environment.

“Many people look at Inca architecture and are impressed with the stonework, but that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” Nair said. “They were also concerned with the ephemeral, temporary and impermanent, and sound was one of those things.

Sound was deeply valued and an incredibly important part of Andean and Inca architecture — so much so that the builders allowed some instability in this structure just because of its acoustic potential.” [emphasis mine]

The partially open structure would have made such buildings significantly less stable than most other Inca buildings. Ironically, Nair said, this carpa uasi has survived for centuries because, perhaps at the direction of Spanish settlers, a church was later built on top of it, stabilizing the structure below.

Nair is collaborating on the project with a team of acoustic experts led by Stanford University music professor Jonathan Berger. Nair primarily studied the carpa uasi’s architecture, taking measurements and making drawings and photographs. Next, she will use hand drawings and 3-D modeling to determine what the roof may have looked like and how the building’s overall form influenced its function. Together, the researchers expect to produce a model for how sound would have traveled through and outside the building.

Toward a more complete understanding

“We’re exploring the possibility that the carpa uasi may have amplified low-frequency sounds, such as drumming, with minimal reverberation,” Nair said. “With this research, for the first time, we’ll be able to tell what the Incas valued sonically in this building.”

Investigating the sonic properties of a 600-year-old building in the Andes is much more than an academic exercise for Nair and her collaborators — and not only because it is the only surviving example of its kind.

“Sound studies are really critical, because we tend to emphasize the visual in how we understand the world around us, including our past,” Nair said. “But that’s not how we experience life — all of our senses are critical. So how we understand ourselves and our history changes if you put sound back into the conversation.”

Nair said the project reflects the importance of collaboration across disciplines, institutions and borders. The American scholars also benefited from the cooperation of partners in Peru, including the priest who oversees the Church of San Juan Bautista, the building whose architecture incorporates the carpa uasi, and a local archaeologist.

Nair’s work was funded in part by a grant from the UCLA College Division of Humanities; Berger received funding from the Templeton Religion Trust.

Ella Feldman’s October 30, 2025 article for the Smithsonian magazine enhances the ‘sound’ story with a few more details about the Inca empire. There’s also more about Stella Nair and her work on her UCLA bio webpage.

AAAS 2012: first day morning (Feb.17.12) session highlight: archaeoacoustics

This is going to be quick as there’s still a lot of conference to go. The 7:30 am press breakfast was scrumptious. There was an arctic presentation. Unfortunately, one of the speakers yelled into his microphone. One of those enthusiastic individuals who speaks loudly in the first place so he really didn’t need to have his voice augmented but then he got excited and that was just too much.

Sadly I did not arrive in time to hear all of the speakers at archaeoacoustics presentation organized by David Lubman. The two poeple I did hear, Steven J. Waller and Lubman were quire fascinating. They both study the acoustics one experiences in various archaeological sites such as Stonehenge,  the Temple of Kukulkan at  Chichen Itza and more. If I understand them rightly both researchers found that the builders of these sites were playing various acoustical properties to create their environments. I was particularly taken with the story about the Temple of Kukulkan which Lubman described as a sound recording device. I’ll see if I can get more about this later but the conference is about to start again.