This is going to be a jam-packed posting with the AI experts at the Canadian Science Policy Centre (CSPC) virtual panel, a look back at a ‘testy’ exchange between Yoshua Bengio (one of Canada’s godfathers of AI) and a former diplomat from China, an update on Canada’s Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation, Evan Solomon and his latest AI push, and a missive from the BC artificial intelligence community.
A Canadian Science Policy Centre AI panel on November 11, 2025
The Canadian Science Policy Centre (CSPC) provides an October 9, 2025 update on an upcoming virtual panel being held on Remembrance Day,
[AI-Driven Misinformation Across Sectors Addressing a Cross-Societal Challenge]
Upcoming Virtual Panel[s]: November 11 [2025]
Artificial Intelligence is transforming how information is created and trusted, offering immense benefits across sectors like healthcare, education, finance, and public discourse—yet also amplifying risks such as misinformation, deepfakes, and scams that threaten public trust. This panel brings together experts from diverse fields [emphasis mine] to examine the manifestations and impacts of AI-driven misinformation and to discuss policy, regulatory, and technical solutions [emphasis mine]. The conversation will highlight practical measures—from digital literacy and content verification to platform accountability—aimed at strengthening resilience in Canada and globally.
For more information on the panel and to register, click below.
Odd timing for this event. Moving on, I found more information on the CSPC’s webpage for this event, Note: Unfortunately, links to the moderator’s and speakers’ bios could not be copied here,
Canadian Science Policy Centre Email info@sciencepolicy.ca
…
This panel brings together cross-sectoral experts to examine how AI-driven misinformation manifests in their respective domains, its consequences, and how policy, regulation, and technical interventions can help mitigate harm. The discussion will explore practical pathways for action, such as digital literacy, risk audits, content verification technologies, platform responsibility, and regulatory frameworks. Attendees will leave with a nuanced understanding of both the risks and the resilience strategies being explored in Canada and globally.
Canada Research Chair in Internet & E-commerce Law, University of Ottawa See Bio
[Panelists]
Dr. Plinio Morita
Associate Professor / Director, Ubiquitous Health Technology Lab, University of Waterloo …
Dr. Nadia Naffi
Université Laval — Associate Professor of Educational Technology and expert on building human agency against AI-augmented disinformation and deepfakes. See Bio
Dr. Jutta Treviranus
Director, Inclusive Design Research Centre, OCAD U, Expert on AI misinformation in the Education sector and schools. See Bio
Dr. Fenwick McKelvey
Concordia University — Expert in political bots, information flows, and Canadian tech governance See Bio
Michael Geist has his own blog/website featuring posts on his ares of interest and featuring his podcast, Law Bytes. Jutta Treviranus is mentioned in my October 13, 2025 posting as a participant in “Who’s afraid of AI? Arts, Sciences, and the Futures of Intelligence,” a conference (October 23 – 24, 205) and arts festival at the University of Toronto (scroll down to find it) . She’s scheduled for a session on Thursday, October 23, 2025.
China, Canada, and the AI Action summit in February 2025
Zoe Kleinman’s February 10, 2025 article for the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) news online website also notes the encounter,
A former Chinese official poked fun at a major international AI safety report led by “AI Godfather” professor Yoshua Bengio and co-authored by 96 global experts – in front of him.
Fu Ying, former vice minister of foreign affairs and once China’s UK ambassador, is now an academic at Tsinghua University in Beijing.
The pair were speaking at a panel discussion ahead of a two-day global AI summit starting in Paris on Monday [February 10, 2025].
The aim of the summit is to unite world leaders, tech executives, and academics to examine AI’s impact on society, governance, and the environment.
Fu Ying began by thanking Canada’s Prof Bengio for the “very, very long” document, adding that the Chinese translation stretched to around 400 pages and she hadn’t finished reading it.
She also had a dig at the title of the AI Safety Institute – of which Prof Bengio is a member.
China now has its own equivalent; but they decided to call it The AI Development and Safety Network, she said, because there are lots of institutes already but this wording emphasised the importance of collaboration.
The AI Action Summit is welcoming guests from 80 countries, with OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman, Microsoft president Brad Smith and Google chief executive Sundar Pichai among the big names in US tech attending.
Elon Musk is not on the guest list but it is currently unknown whether he will decide to join them. [As of February 13, 2025, Mr. Musk did not attend the summit, which ended February 11, 2025.]
A key focus is regulating AI in an increasingly fractured world. The summit comes weeks after a seismic industry shift as China’s DeepSeek unveiled a powerful, low-cost AI model, challenging US dominance.
The pair’s heated exchanges were a symbol of global political jostling in the powerful AI arms race, but Fu Ying also expressed regret about the negative impact of current hostilities between the US and China on the progress of AI safety.
…
She gave a carefully-crafted glimpse behind the curtain of China’s AI scene, describing an “explosive period” of innovation since the country first published its AI development plan in 2017, five years before ChatGPT became a viral sensation in the west.
She added that “when the pace [of development] is rapid, risky stuff occurs” but did not elaborate on what might have taken place.
“The Chinese move faster [than the west] but it’s full of problems,” she said.
Fu Ying argued that building AI tools on foundations which are open source, meaning everyone can see how they work and therefore contribute to improving them, was the most effective way to make sure the tech did not cause harm.
Most of the US tech giants do not share the tech which drives their products.
Open source offers humans “better opportunities to detect and solve problems”, she said, adding that “the lack of transparency among the giants makes people nervous”.
But Prof Bengio disagreed.
His view was that open source also left the tech wide open for criminals to misuse.
He did however concede that “from a safety point of view”, it was easier to spot issues with the viral Chinese AI assistant DeepSeek, which was built using open source architecture, than ChatGPT, whose code has not been shared by its creator OpenAI.
…
Interesting, non? You can read more about Bengio’s views in an October 1, 2025 article by Rae Witte for Futurism.
In a Policy Forum, Yue Zhu and colleagues provide an overview of China’s emerging regulation for artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and its potential contributions to global AI governance. Open-source AI systems from China are rapidly expanding worldwide, even as the country’s regulatory framework remains in flux. In general, AI governance suffers from fragmented approaches, a lack of clarity, and difficulty reconciling innovation with risk management, making global coordination especially hard in the face of rising controversy. Although no official AI law has yet been enacted, experts in China have drafted two influential proposals – the Model AI Law and the AI Law (Scholar’s Proposal) – which serve as key references for ongoing policy discussions. As the nation’s lawmakers prepare to draft a consolidated AI law, Zhu et al. note that the decisions will shape not only China’s innovation, but also global collaboration on AI safety, openness, and risk mitigation. Here, the authors discuss China’s emerging AI regulation as structured around 6 pillars, which, combined, stress exemptive laws, efficient adjudication, and experimentalist requirements, while safeguarding against extreme risks. This framework seeks to balance responsible oversight with pragmatic openness, allowing developers to innovate for the long term and collaborate across the global research community. According to Zhu et al., despite the need for greater clarity, harmonization, and simplification, China’s evolving model is poised to shape future legislation and contribute meaningfully to global AI governance by promoting both safety and innovation at a time when international cooperation on extreme risks is urgently needed.
Here’s a link to and a citation for the paper,
China’s emerging regulation toward an open future for AI by Yue Zhu, Bo He, Hongyu Fu, Naying Hu, Shaoqing Wu, Taolue Zhang, Xinyi Liu, Gang Xu, Linghan Zhang, and Hui Zhou. Science 9 Oct 2025Vol 390, Issue 6769 pp. 132-135 DOI: 10.1126/science.ady7922
This paper is behind a paywall.
No mention of Fu Ying or China’s ‘The AI Development and Safety Network’ but perhaps that’s in the paper.
Canada and its Minister of AI and Digital Innovation
Evan Solomon (born April 20, 1968)[citation needed] is a Canadian politician and broadcaster who has been the minister of artificial intelligence and digital innovation since May 2025. A member of the Liberal Party, Solomon was elected as the member of Parliament (MP) for Toronto Centre in the April 2025 election.
He was the host of The Evan Solomon Show on Toronto-area talk radio station CFRB,[2] and a writer for Maclean’s magazine. He was the host of CTV’s national political news programs Power Play and Question Period.[3] In October 2022, he moved to New York City to accept a position with the Eurasia Group as publisher of GZERO Media.[4] Solomon continued with CTV News as a “special correspondent” reporting on Canadian politics and global affairs.”[4]
…
Had you asked me what background one needs to be a ‘Minister of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation’, media would not have been my first thought. That said, sometimes people can surprise you.
Solomon appears to be an enthusiast if a June 10, 2025 article by Anja Karadeglija for The Canadian Press is to be believed,
Canada’s new minister of artificial intelligence said Tuesday [June 10, 2025] he’ll put less emphasis on AI regulation and more on finding ways to harness the technology’s economic benefits [emphases mine].
In his first speech since becoming Canada’s first-ever AI minister, Evan Solomon said Canada will move away from “over-indexing on warnings and regulation” to make sure the economy benefits from AI.
His regulatory focus will be on data protection and privacy, he told the audience at an event in Ottawa Tuesday morning organized by the think tank Canada 2020.
Solomon said regulation isn’t about finding “a saddle to throw on the bucking bronco called AI innovation. That’s hard. But it is to make sure that the horse doesn’t kick people in the face. And we need to protect people’s data and their privacy.”
The previous government introduced a privacy and AI regulation bill that targeted high-impact AI systems. It did not become law before the election was called.
That bill is “not gone, but we have to re-examine in this new environment where we’re going to be on that,” Solomon said.
He said constraints on AI have not worked at the international level.
“It’s really hard. There’s lots of leakages,” he said. “The United States and China have no desire to buy into any constraint or regulation.”
That doesn’t mean regulation won’t exist, he said, but it will have to be assembled in steps.
…
Solomon’s comments follow a global shift among governments to focus on AI adoption and away from AI safety and governance.
The first global summit focusing on AI safety was held in 2023 as experts warned of the technology’s dangers — including the risk that it could pose an existential threat to humanity. At a global meeting in Korea last year, countries agreed to launch a network of publicly backed safety institutes.
But the mood had shifted by the time this year’s AI Action Summit began in Paris. …
…
Solomon outlined several priorities for his ministry — scaling up Canada’s AI industry, driving adoption and ensuring Canadians have trust in and sovereignty over the technology.
He said that includes supporting Canadian AI companies like Cohere, which “means using government as essentially an industrial policy to champion our champions.”
The federal government is putting together a task force to guide its next steps on artificial intelligence, and Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Solomon is promising an update to the government’s AI strategy.
Solomon told the All In artificial intelligence conference in Montreal on Wednesday [September 24, 2025] that the “refreshed” strategy will be tabled later this year, “almost two years ahead of schedule.”
…
“We need to update and move quickly,” he said in a keynote speech at the start of the conference.
The task force will include about 20 representatives from industry, academia and civil society. The government says it won’t reveal the membership until later this week.
Solomon said task force members are being asked to consult with their networks, suggest “bold, practical” ideas and report back to him in November [2025].
The group will look at various topics related to AI, including research, adoption, commercialization, investment, infrastructure, skills, and safety and security. The government is also planning to solicit input from the public. [emphasis mine]
Canada was the first country to launch a national AI strategy [the Pan-Canadian AI Strategy announced in 2016], which the government updated in 2022. The strategy focuses on commercialization, the development and adoption of AI standards, talent and research.
Solomon also teased a “major quantum initiative” coming in October [2025?] to ensure both quantum computing talent and intellectual property stay in the country.
Solomon called digital sovereignty “the most pressing policy and democratic issue of our time” and stressed the importance of Canada having its own “digital economy that someone else can’t decide to turn off.”
Solomon said the federal government’s recent focus on major projects extends to artificial intelligence. He compared current conversations on Canada’s AI framework to the way earlier generations spoke about a national railroad or highway.
…
He said his government will address concerns about AI by focusing on privacy reform and modernizing Canada’s 25-year-old privacy law.
“We’re going to include protections for consumers who are concerned about things like deep fakes and protection for children, because that’s a big, big issue. And we’re going to set clear standards for the use of data so innovators have clarity to unlock investment,” Solomon said.
…
The government is consulting with the public? Experience suggests that when all the major decisions will have been made; the public consultation comments will mined so officials can make some minor, unimportant tweaks.
Canada’s AI Task Force and parts of the Empire Club talk are revealed in a September 26, 2025 article by Alex Riehl for BetaKit,
Inovia Capital partner Patrick Pichette, Cohere chief artificial intelligence (AI) officer Joelle Pineau, and Build Canada founder Dan Debow are among 26 members of AI minister Evan Solomon’s AI Strategy Task Force trusted to help the federal government renew its AI strategy.
Solomon revealed the roster, filled with leading Canadian researchers and business figures, while speaking at the Empire Club in Toronto on Friday morning [September 26, 2025]. He teased its formation at the ALL IN conference earlier this week [September 24, 2025], saying the team would include “innovative thinkers from across the country.”
The group will have 30 days to add to a collective consultation process in areas including research, talent, commercialization, safety, education, infrastructure, and security.
…
The full AI Strategy Task Force is listed below; each member will consult their network on specific themes.
Research and Talent
Gail Murphy, professor of computer science and vice-president – research and innovation, University of British Columbia and vice-chair at the Digital Research Alliance of Canada
Diane Gutiw, VP – global AI research lead, CGI Canada and co-chair of the Advisory Council on AI
Michael Bowling, professor of computer science and principal investigator – Reinforcement Learning and Artificial Intelligence Lab, University of Alberta and research fellow, Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute and Canada CIFAR AI chair
Arvind Gupta, professor of computer science, University of Toronto
Adoption across industry and governments
Olivier Blais, co-founder and VP of AI, Moov and co-chair of the Advisory Council on AI
Cari Covent, technology executive
Dan Debow, chair of the board, Build Canada
Commercialization of AI
Louis Têtu, executive chairman, Coveo
Michael Serbinis, founder and CEO, League and board chair of the Perimeter Institute
Adam Keating, CEO and Founder, CoLab
Scaling our champions and attracting investment
Patrick Pichette, general partner, Inovia Capital
Ajay Agrawal, professor of strategic management, University of Toronto, founder, Next Canada and founder, Creative Destruction Lab
Sonia Sennik, CEO, Creative Destruction Lab
Ben Bergen, president, Council of Canadian Innovators
Building safe AI systems and public trust in AI
Mary Wells, dean of engineering, University of Waterloo
Joelle Pineau, chief AI officer, Cohere
Taylor Owen, founding director, Center [sic] for Media, Technology and Democracy [McGill University]
Education and Skills
Natiea Vinson, CEO, First Nations Technology Council
Alex Laplante, VP – cash management technology Canada, Royal Bank of Canada and board member at Mitacs
David Naylor, professor of medicine – University of Toronto
Infrastructure
Garth Gibson, chief technology and AI officer, VDURA
Ian Rae, president and CEO, Aptum
Marc Etienne Ouimette, chair of the board, Digital Moment and member, OECD One AI Group of Experts, affiliate researcher, sovereign AI, Cambridge University Bennett School of Public Policy
Security
Shelly Bruce, distinguished fellow, Centre for International Governance Innovation
James Neufeld, founder and CEO, Samdesk
Sam Ramadori, co-president and executive director, LawZero
With files from Josh Scott
If you have the time, Riehl ‘s September 26, 2025 article offers more depth than may be apparent in the excerpts I’ve chosen.
It’s been a while since I’ve seen Arvind Gupta’s name. I’m glad to see he’s part of this Task Force (Research and Talent). The man was treated quite shamefully at the University of British Columbia. (For the curious, this August 18, 2015 article by Ken MacQueen for Maclean’s Magazine presents a somewhat sanitized [in my opinion] review of the situation.)
One final comment, the experts on the virtual panel and members of Solomon’s Task Force are largely from Ontario and Québec. There is minor representation from others parts of the country but it is minor.
British Columbia wants entry into the national AI discussion
Just after I finished writing up this post, I received Kris Krug’s (techartist, quasi-sage, cyberpunk anti-hero from the future) October 14, 2025 communication (received via email) regarding an initiative from the BC + AI community,
Growth vs Guardrails: BC’s Framework for Steering AI
Our open letter to Minister Solomon shares what we’ve learned building community-led AI governance and how BC can help.
Ottawa created a Minister of Artificial Intelligence and just launched a national task force to shape the country’s next AI strategy. The conversation is happening right now about who gets compute, who sets the rules, and whose future this technology will serve.
Our new feature, Growth vs Guardrails [see link to letter below for ‘guardrails’], is already making the rounds in those rooms. The message is simple: if Ottawa’s foot is on the gas, BC is the steering wheel and the brakes. We can model a clean, ethical, community-led path that keeps power with people and place.
This is the time to show up together. Not as scattered voices, but as a connected movement with purpose, vision, and political gravity.
Over the past few months, almost 100 of us have joined as the new BC + AI Ecosystem Association non-profit as Founding Members. Builders. Artists. Researchers. Investors. Educators. Policymakers. People who believe that tech should serve communities, not the other way around.
Now we’re opening the door wider. Join and you’ll be part of the core group that built this from the ground up. Your membership is declaration that British Columbia deserves to shape its own AI future with ethics, creativity, and care.
If you’ve been watching from the sidelines, this is the time to lean in. We don’t do panels. We do portals. And this is the biggest one we’ve opened yet.
See you inside,
Kris Krüg Executive Director BC + AI Ecosystem Association kk@bc-ai.ca | bc-ai.ca
Canada just spun up a 30-day sprint to shape its next AI strategy. Minister Evan Solomon assembled 26 experts (mostly industry and academia) to advise on research, adoption, commercialization, safety, skills, and infrastructure.
On paper, it’s a pivot moment. In practice, it’s already drawing fire. Too much weight on scaling, not enough on governance. Too many boardrooms, not enough frontlines. Too much Ottawa, not enough ground truth.
…
This is Canada’s chance to reset the DNA of its AI ecosystem.
But only if we choose regeneration over extraction, sovereign data governance over corporate capture, and community benefit over narrow interests.
…
The Problem With The Task Force
Research says: The group’s stacked with expertise. But critics flag the imbalance. Where’s healthcare? Where’s civil society beyond token representation? Where are the people who’ll feel AI’s impact first: frontline workers, artists, community organizers?
…
The worry:Commercialization and scaling overshadow public trust, governance, and equitable outcomes. Again.
The numbers back this up: Only 24% of Canadians have AI training. Just 38% feel confident in their knowledge. Nearly two-thirds see potential harm. 71% would trust AI more under public regulation.
We’re building a national strategy on a foundation of low literacy and eroding trust. That’s not a recipe for sovereignty. That’s a recipe for capture.
Principles for a National AI Strategy: What BC + AI Stands For
I was very happy to see that a new edition of ‘The State of Science and Technology in Canada‘ or similarly named report from the Council of Canadian Academies (CCA). Here’s more about that report and others form the CCA’s May 2025 issue of The Advance (received via email),
Building Canada’s “report card” for science, technology, and innovation
In September 2006, the CCA published The State of Science and Technology in Canada—an expert assessment of the scientific disciplines and technological applications in which Canada excels. Commissioned by Industry Canada [or Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada or ISED], the report provided a much-needed foundation for benchmarking Canada’s strengths in science and technology; previously, the report noted, there was “almost no published literature focused specifically on strengths of the Canadian science and technology system overall, and particularly not at a reasonably fine level of detail.” The CCA has built upon its inaugural study ever since, steadily reassessing Canada’s science and technology strengths as well as the relationships between research, development, and innovation.
With our next assessment of Canada’s science, technology, and innovation ecosystem underway, with support from ISED’s Strategic Science Fund, we are revisiting our flagship assessments and their impacts on our collective understanding of science, technology, and innovation.
For the inaugural edition of The State of Science and Technology in Canada, the CCA recruited a ten-person expert panel chaired by Elizabeth Dowdeswell, O.C. In order to create a well-rounded picture of Canadian innovation, the panel analyzed patents grants and citations as well as peer-reviewed journal publications; conducted an extensive literature review; and surveyed more than 1,500 experts on the strength and trajectory of Canada’s overall science and technology efforts and areas of note. The resulting report provided a broad sweep of expertise as well as granular information.
Since then, the CCA has published three additional assessments of Canada’s science, technology, and innovation performance, all at the request of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. They include a second volume of The State of Science and Technology in Canada (2012); The State of Industrial Research and Development in Canada (2013); and Competing in a Global Innovation Economy (2018). This year, the CCA will publish a fifth installment focused on the current state of science, technology, and innovation.
[graphic]
Over the years, the CCA’s science and technology assessments have documented Canada’s reputation for world-leading infrastructure, high levels of education attainment, substantial research output and impact. They have also detailed declining R&D investment and intensity, and the accelerating outflow of Canada-born patents. They have identified sectors of R&D strength, from computer systems design to scientific research and development, and research-publication strengths in fields such as clinical medicine, public health, and the performing arts. Each assessment provides a multi-part assessment of Canada’s progress to-date, and an actionable platform for improving national prosperity, competitiveness, and well-being.
The CCA’s assessments have evolved in tandem with Canada’s science and technology landscape, expanding and refining the metrics on which we draw to detail its strengths and challenges. Our efforts include a Subcommittee on Science and Technology Research Methods, to provide recommendations for improving methodologies and closing data gaps. From research output to patents, from public- and private-sector investment to fields of global renown, each new assessment provides advanced methodologies for understanding Canadian innovation as it unfolds.
There’s more in the CCA’s May 2025 issue of The Advance,
Members of the Expert Panel on Balancing Research Security and Open Science for Dual-Use Research of Concern gathered in Ottawa in early May for a panel meeting, ahead of the project’s planned Fall 2025 release.
CIFAR is now accepting applications for its Neuroscience of Consciousness Winter School, to be held in Montebello, Quebec. CIFAR describes the school as “a unique, three-day event where tomorrow’s neuroscience leaders work closely with world-class researchers.” The deadline for applications is June 23 [2025].
For the Conversation, a team of researchers examines Canada’s “fragmented immunization data” and a drop in vaccine confidence, then asks if the country is prepared for a new pandemic. “In 2024, 17 per cent of Canadian parents were ‘really against’ vaccinating their children, up from four per cent in 2019,” write the researchers, drawing on work by the CCA’s Expert Panel on the Socioeconomic Impacts of Science and Health Misinformation. (Noni MacDonald, a co-author, served as a member of the CCA panel.)
TamIA, the first piece of the Pan-Canadian AI Compute Environment (PAICE), launched at Université Laval. TamIA is a computing cluster that will work in tandem with infrastructure at the University of Alberta and the University of Toronto. Frédéric Chanay-Savoyen, Vice President of AI Solutions and Technology at Mila, a PAICE partner, says TamIA’s increased computing capacity “makes it possible to develop an environment that fosters interdisciplinary collaboration on a national scale and that will allow Quebec and Canada to maintain its position as a leader in the field of cutting-edge AI research.”
The Open Notebook, a nonprofit that supports science journalists, recently asked a group of reporters how they navigate research reports, especially those that are hundreds (or thousands) of pages long. Their responses hold insights for all members of the science media.
Dr. Henry Friesen, best known for his discovery of prolactin and his trailblazing research on human growth hormones, died on April 30 at 90 years old. Friesen, a former member of the CCA’s Board of Governors, helped lead the development of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and is a member of the Canadian Medical Hall of Fame, among many other honours.
This May 18, 2017 news item on Nanowerk features research at the Université Laval (Québec, Canada), Note: A link has been removed,
Researchers at Université Laval’s Faculty of Science and Engineering and its Center for Optics, Photonics, and Lasers have created a smart T-shirt that monitors the wearer’s respiratory rate in real time.
This innovation, the details of which are published in the latest edition of Sensors (“Wearable Contactless Respiration Sensor Based on Multi-Material Fibers Integrated into Textile”), paves the way for manufacturing clothing that could be used to diagnose respiratory illnesses or monitor people suffering from asthma, sleep apnea, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Unlike other methods of measuring respiratory rate, the smart T-shirt works without any wires, electrodes, or sensors attached to the user’s body, explains Younès Messaddeq, the professor who led the team that developed the technology. “The T-shirt is really comfortable and doesn’t inhibit the subject’s natural movements. Our tests show that the data captured by the shirt is reliable, whether the user is lying down, sitting, standing, or moving around.”
The key to the smart T-shirt is an antenna sewn in at chest level that’s made of a hollow optical fiber coated with a thin layer of silver on its inner surface. The fiber’s exterior surface is covered in a polymer that protects it against the environment. “The antenna does double?duty, sensing and transmitting the signals created by respiratory movements,” adds Professor Messaddeq, who also holds the Canada Excellence Research Chair in Photonic Innovations. “The data can be sent to the user’s smartphone or a nearby computer.”
As the wearer breathes in, the smart fiber senses the increase in both thorax circumference and the volume of air in the lungs, explains Messaddeq. “These changes modify some of the resonant frequency of the antenna. That’s why the T-shirt doesn’t need to be tight or in direct contact with the wearer’s skin. The oscillations that occur with each breath are enough for the fiber to sense the user’s respiratory rate.”
To assess the durability of their invention, the researchers put a T-shirt equipped with an antenna through the wash—literally. “After 20 washes, the antenna had withstood the water and detergent and was still in good working condition,” says Messaddeq.
Québec City’s (Canada) Musée de la Civilisation (Museum of Civilization) opened its “Nanotech: the invisible revolution” exhibit (also known as, “Nanotechnologies: l’invisible révolution”) on March 9, 2016 and it will run until April 2, 2016. Cassandra Kerwin’s March 16, 2016 article for qctonline.com notes this,
Featuring elements inspired by science fiction, comic books and today’s products and gadgets, it will have visitors wondering about the meaning and impact of infinitely small technology on daily life.
Today’s “nanos” can be found in electronic gadgets, cosmetics, sports equipment, and medical treatments. Thousands more promising new applications are also on the way.
Nanotechnology has drawn on as well as influenced science fiction, sometimes in dark visions of a future world where humanity is at the mercy of developments in technology. Such future images can affect public perceptions. Debates have intensified, and in the last few decades enthusiasm for scientific discoveries has increasingly given way to a certain wariness.
Visitors will be encouraged to make up their own minds about current issues in nanotech development.
Les nanos sont présentes, par exemple, dans les appareils électroniques, les cosmétiques, les équipements sportifs et les traitements médicaux. Elles promettent des milliers de nouvelles utilisations intéressantes. Souvent inspirées par la science-fiction, les nanotechnologies revêtent parfois, dans des mondes futuristes, un caractère sombre où l’humain est à la merci des développements technologiques. Au cours des dernières décennies, l’enthousiasme généré par les découvertes scientifiques a laissé une place grandissante à une certaine méfiance du public face à la science, souvent dûe à une méconnaissance des notions scientifiques parfois complexes liées à ces découvertes. Le scepticisme relié aux changements climatiques ou encore à l’efficacité ou la sécurité des vaccins en sont des exemples concrets.
Nanotechnology-enabled products can be found everywhere, for example, in electronics, beauty projects, sporting goods, and biomedical applications. Nanotechnology also promises novel applications for the future. As sometimes depicted in science fiction. nanotechnology features in a dystopian future where humans are at the mercy of technological development. Over the last decades, the enthusiasm earlier generations showed for scientific discovery has given rise to distrust sometimes due to not understanding the science underlying the discovery. Examples of this distrust include climate change deniers and anti-vaccine proponents.
« Le Musée de la civilisation fait figure de modèle inspirant en muséologie, non seulement par ses approches et ses concepts audacieux, mais aussi par ses actions en périphérie comme sa mission éducative auprès des jeunes et ses projets de médiation culturelle. En ouvrant son espace au « nanomonde », le musée devient un point de convergence de la culture et de la science, ces deux piliers fondateurs de l’évolution de notre société. Le fait de démocratiser la science dans un lieu culturel à la portée d’un large public est indéniablement profitable », a déclaré le ministre de la Culture et des Communications et ministre responsable de la Protection et de la Promotion de la langue française, M. Luc Fortin.
“The museum is an inspiring museology model not only due to its audacious concepts but also because of activities such as youth education programmes and cultural outreach efforts. In devoting an exhibition to the ‘nanoworld’, the museum becomes a point of convergence for culture and science, two foundational pillars of evolution for society. Democratizing and making science accessible to the public at large though a cultural institution is undeniably profitable,” declared the Luc Fortin, Minister of Culture and Communication and the Minister Responsible for the Protection and Promotion of the French Language.
« Voilà un sujet qui convient bien au Musée de la civilisation. Ni musée d’histoire, ni musée de science, ni musée d’anthropologie ou d’ethnologie, ni musée d’art, mais un heureux amalgame de tout ça. Un musée de société dont la préoccupation première demeure l’être humain et ses questionnements, a souligné son directeur général, M. Stéphan La Roche. Dans cette exposition, réalité, science et fiction se côtoient habilement et, au cœur du propos, se trouve cet être humain appelé à s’interroger sur les innombrables impacts sociaux des nanotechnologies », a conclu M. La Roche.
« Nous sommes très fiers d’avoir contribué à la réalisation de cette exposition, a soutenu Pierre Lapointe, président et directeur général de FPInnovations, et nous sommes très heureux du résultat. Nous sommes persuadés que le public fera de grandes découvertes et qu’il sera surpris des possibilités qu’offrent les nanotechnologies, notamment dans le domaine de la foresterie. »
« Les nanotechnologies recèlent un immense potentiel d’innovation et de développement social et économique pour le Québec, a affirmé Benoit Balmana, président et directeur général de PRIMA QUÉBEC. Cette exposition met en évidence des développements d’applications extraordinaires tout en n’occultant pas les risques et les facteurs d’acceptation sociale. C’est une occasion unique de confronter le monde scientifique, industriel et la société pour assurer un développement responsable des innovations technologiques. »
« Au Québec, nous avons acquis une expertise reconnue mondialement en matière de nanotechnologies, et pour nous démarquer encore davantage dans ce secteur, nous devons poursuivre nos efforts en recherche et en innovation, favoriser le transfert technologique et tout mettre en œuvre pour développer une relève scientifique », a déclaré Rémi Quirion, ph. D., scientifique en chef du Québec. « Cette formidable exposition contribuera assurément à mieux faire connaître du grand public les nanotechnologies, et ce, dans toutes leurs dimensions : de la technologie à ses applications sociales, notamment dans le domaine de la santé, en passant par les enjeux éthiques. Elle incitera sûrement des jeunes intéressés par les carrières scientifiques à se tourner vers cet univers aussi prometteur que fascinant. »
Quotes from various dignitaries and important people which can be summarized as: “This is a wonderful exhibit and we (the province of Quebec, our organization, and/or the museum) are doing wonderful things.”
Le parcours du visiteur : oui ou non aux nanos?
Après une brève introduction sur les nanotechnologies, le visiteur est invité à prendre position face aux enjeux actuels liés au développement des nanotechnologies. Deux parcours sont possibles : oui ou non au développement des nanotechnologies dans le futur? Pour accompagner le visiteur et valider ses choix, un petit canard jaune en plastique muni d’une puce est mis à sa disposition.
Oui aux nanos!
Avec ces choix de parcours, on présente les espoirs générés par le développement des nanos et comment elles ont inspiré des auteurs de science-fiction. On y découvre aussi comment elles sont présentes dans notre vie quotidienne. Ici, figurine de Cora Peterson (Raquel Welch) du film Le voyage fantastique, sculpture d’Iron Man grandeur nature, série de processeurs, produits cosmétiques… illustrent l’intégration des nanotechnologies dans des univers réels ou imaginaires.
Non aux nanos!
Faisant contrepoids à l’enthousiasme face au développement des nanotechnologies, le volet non aux nanos présente les craintes qu’elles soulèvent : les incertitudes quant à leur présence dans notre quotidien et les risques potentiels pour la santé et l’environnement. Ici, on retrouve des figurines, des bandes dessinées ou des éléments associés à l’univers de la science-fiction (Terminator, Hulk…), une combinaison de protection pour laboratoire de nanotechnologies, des téléphones cellulaires de différentes époques…
Faire un choix… à l’aide d’un canard jaune!
À divers moment dans l’exposition, des énoncés sont émis incitant le visiteur à faire son choix. Ceux-ci abordent l’intégration des technologies au corps humain, l’utilisation des nanos pour le développement de l’électronique ou les traitements médicaux, la potentielle domination sur l’humain, souvent illustrée en science-fiction et qui suscite bien des inquiétudes. En fin de parcours, le visiteur remet son petit canard jaune. Ses résultats individuels sont ensuite compilés et livrés sous forme d’analyse graphique. Il peut ensuite voir les résultats globaux de tous les visiteurs ayant fait le parcours sur un écran de diffusion.
After a brief introduction to the concept of nanotechnology, I believe they’re saying the exhibit represents two basic views: ‘yes to nano’ and ‘no to nano’ and the visitor is invited to participate by means of a yellow duck (in English sometimes referred to familiarly as a “yellow rubber ducky”) with a computer chip.
In the ‘yes to nano corner’, hopes and dreams for the future inspired by science fiction are presented along with the examples of the current presence of nanotechnology-enabled products in our daily lives. Illustrating these themes of the imaginary and the real are figures of Cora Peterson (Raquel Welch) in Fantastic Voyage and an Iron Man figure along with computer processors and cosmetic products.
In the ‘no to nano corner’ risks to the environment and health and safety are represented both through such cautionary science fiction tales as Terminator, the Hulk, and others along with real life concerns in laboratories.
At different points in the exibit, visitors will be asked to make a choice (vote) with their yellow duck as to, for example, whether we should integrate technology into the body and whether nanotechnology should be used to further develop electronics or medical applications. Concerns about technological domination over human existence are also raised.
As the visit is ended, participants hand off their yellow ducks so their votes can be tallied and added to a data visualization which shows the results of all the visitors’ data on a screen.
Un peu d’histoire
Le centre de l’exposition aborde l’histoire et l’évolution des sciences qui a permis d’atteindre l’échelle du nanomètre avant de mettre en valeur quelques projets de recherche prometteurs en nanotechnologies au Québec. On découvre notamment que, depuis des siècles, la nature utilise des propriétés particulières de l’échelle nanométrique pour conférer des habiletés extraordinaires et des couleurs magnifiques à certains animaux. Dans le même esprit, on apprend que les humains, à leur insu, ont utilisé des propriétés de cette échelle donnant des caractéristiques uniques à certains objets comme des vitraux médiévaux et des sabres de Damas au tranchant redoutable. Enfin, quelques projets de recherche prometteurs en nanotechnologies au Québec sont mis en valeur.
Part of this show focuses on the history of science and how we became able to research and work at the nanoscale. There’s a reference to nature which has used nanoscale structures to colour birds in brilliant colours and given other animals extraordinary abilities. [There is a field known as biomimicry/bioinspired engineering/biomimetics which focuses on nature’s nanostructures.] It should also be noted that humans have (naïvely) made use of nanoscale properties in materials such as the stained glass windows in medieval churches and Damascus steel blades. The exhibit also showcases some current nanotechnology research from Québec.
Un défi de taille!
Comment montrer l’infiniment petit? L’objet-même de l’exposition pose un défi de taille! Néanmoins, des objets de nature diverse et visibles à l’œil nu appuient le propos : objets de collection tirés de l’univers de la science-fiction, objets du quotidien contenant des nanoparticules, modèles moléculaires, microscopes, espèces de la faune qui utilisent des propriétés nanos pour raffiner leur anatomie (tels des papillons et deux geckos vivants). À ces objets extrêmement variés s’ajoutent des interactifs, des audiovisuels, des illustrations et une installation du biologiste et artiste François-Joseph Lapointe qui reflète votre niveau de stress du moment.
Size presents this challenge: how to create an exhibit of the infinitely small? The answer was to include science fiction elements and figures, nanotechnology-enabled consumer products, models of molecules, microscopes, fauna that utilize nanoscale properties such as butterflies and two geckos. There are also audio visual materials, illustrations, and an installation by biologist and artist, François-Joseph Lapointe.
Autour de l’exposition
Des activités de médiation éducative sont offertes autour de l’exposition dès le 19 mars prochain. Le Musée propose des visites commentées et une animation à partir de l’installation Nanozen de l’artiste et biologiste François-Joseph Lapointe. À compter de septembre, des visites de l’exposition et des activités d’expérimentation et de réflexion seront offertes aux groupes scolaires. Enfin, des activités de médiation culturelle complèteront la programmation, dont une table-ronde intitulée Nano où es-tu?, présentée le 7 mai dans le cadre des 24 heures de science.
As of March 19, 2016 there are ancillary educational programmes such as tours and the Nanozen installation by François-Joseph Lapointe. And in September 2016, school tours will be offered. In the realm of culture programming, a roundtable discussion titled (literally): Nano where are you? (I think they mean: What is your position on Nano?) on May 7, 2016 as part of the 24 hours of science 2016 event.
Nanotechnologies : l’invisible révolution, au Musée de la civilisation à Québec, du 9 mars 2016 au 2 avril 2017. Une exposition conçue et réalisée par le Musée de la civilisation avec la participation de PRIMA QUÉBEC et ses partenaires : Fonds de recherche du Québec (FRQ), FPInnovations, Centre de Collaboration MiQro Innovation (C2MI), Centre de recherche industriel du Québec (CRIQ), École Polytechnique de Montréal, Institut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST), Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), Université Concordia, Université de Montréal, Université du Québec à Montréal, Université Laval, Université McGill, Université de Sherbrooke et Arboranano.
The exhibit runs from March 9, 2016 – April 2, 2017 and a list of donors follows.
There’s information about tickets and hours here (the top price is $16 for an adult ticket).
Should anyone have a better translation please do let me know in the comments section.
I think this is the first time I’ve had any research from Université Laval (Québec; Laval University) and it seems fitting that it would involve maple syrup. From a Dec. 22, 2015 Université Laval news release on EurekAlert,
Arthritis and other inflammatory diseases could someday be treated with medication containing a molecule from maple syrup. Université Laval researchers demonstrated in a recent study that quebecol, a molecule found in maple syrup, has interesting properties for fighting the body’s inflammatory response.
Discovered in 2011, quebecol is the result of chemical reactions during the syrup-making process that transform the naturally occurring polyphenols in maple sap. After successfully synthesizing quebecol and its derivatives, Université Laval researchers under the supervision of Normand Voyer, a chemist with the Faculty of Science and Engineering, evaluated its anti-inflammatory properties. They called on colleague Daniel Grenier of the Faculty of Dentistry, who developed an in vitro model for determining the anti-inflammatory potential of natural molecules. “We take blood cells called macrophages and put them with bacterial toxins,” explained Professor Grenier. “Macrophages usually react by triggering an inflammatory response. But if the culture medium contains an anti-inflammatory molecule, this response is blocked.”
The researchers carried out tests that showed quebecol curbs the inflammatory response of macrophages, and some derivatives are even more effective than the original molecule. “The most powerful derivative has a simpler structure and is easier to synthesize than quebecol,” said Normand Voyer. “This paves the way for a whole new class of anti-inflammatory agents, inspired by quebecol, that could compensate for the low efficacy of certain treatments while reducing the risk of side effects.”
